2011
DOI: 10.1021/cg200120p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpenetration, Self-Catenation, and New Topology in Metal–Organic Frameworks of Cobalt with Mixed Organic Linkers

Abstract: Crystal Growth & DesignCOMMUNICATION emphasizes the great fascination, potentials, and challenges in constructing and designing MOFs with new entanglement topologies.' ASSOCIATED CONTENT b S Supporting Information. Details of the experimental measurements and crystallographic studies, structures, TGA curve, PXRD patterns, and computation results for 1 and 2 (PDF format) and X-ray crystallographic information (CIF format). This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The strongest and most reliable labile interaction that is used for this purpose is metal-ligand coordinate bond formation, and there are numerous examples of coordination networks in which the metal ion selects for a mixture of ligand types rather than forming homoleptic complexes, to give threecomponent (metal salt + ligand A + ligand B) assemblies. Typical recent examples include Co(II)-based networks containing both 4,4 0 -bipyridine and bis-carboxylate bridging ligands in which the metal ions have N 2 O 4 coordination environments, 45 and a Ni(II)/ Ni(III) coordination network containing both pyridine-4-carboxylate and benzene 1,4-dicarboxylate ligands. 46 A related example with the logic inversed -one ligand having two orthogonal binding sites to select for two types of metal ion -is provided by a ligand containing a pyrazolyl-pyridine chelating site which binds to Ni(II) or Co(II) ions, and a pendant nitrile group, which coordinates to Ag(I) ions.…”
Section: Paul R Raithbymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strongest and most reliable labile interaction that is used for this purpose is metal-ligand coordinate bond formation, and there are numerous examples of coordination networks in which the metal ion selects for a mixture of ligand types rather than forming homoleptic complexes, to give threecomponent (metal salt + ligand A + ligand B) assemblies. Typical recent examples include Co(II)-based networks containing both 4,4 0 -bipyridine and bis-carboxylate bridging ligands in which the metal ions have N 2 O 4 coordination environments, 45 and a Ni(II)/ Ni(III) coordination network containing both pyridine-4-carboxylate and benzene 1,4-dicarboxylate ligands. 46 A related example with the logic inversed -one ligand having two orthogonal binding sites to select for two types of metal ion -is provided by a ligand containing a pyrazolyl-pyridine chelating site which binds to Ni(II) or Co(II) ions, and a pendant nitrile group, which coordinates to Ag(I) ions.…”
Section: Paul R Raithbymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The early examples of 3D self-penetrating coordination polymers were described by Robson and co-workers . In 2a , one bpp ligand in the hexagonal Zn 6 (bpp) 2 (obc) 4 circuit (highlighted in yellow in Figure a) threads into the smaller square window Zn 4 (bpp) 2 (obc) 2 (highlighted in green) thus resulting in a self-penetrating array, so-called self-penetration (or self-catenation). Although the origin of the self-penetrated structure is not clearly known, the presence of π–π stacking between obc and bpp molecules via an edge-to-face (gray dashed line, C–H···centroid distance 3.507 Å) mode and H-bonding (blue dashed line, C–H···O 2.633 Å) may be responsible for the stabilization of 2a .…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strategically designing or selecting featured organic ligands on the basis of their functional groups/substituent, coordination modes, length, and rigidity is an efficient route to achieve expected MOFs . In this regard, no matter whether some substituent, such as nitro groups, participate or not in the coordination, it may further exert a profound effect on the assembling process, structures, and physical properties of the complexes. However, the effect of such functional groups/substituent on the structural construction is not explicit. To gain an insight into that function and make expected MOFs, it is significantly important to compare these four structures with other Mn­(II) MOFs constructed by similar ligands.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%