Interpersonal Deception Theory

Buller, David B.; Burgoon, Judee K.

doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1996.tb00127.x

Cited by 891 publications

(803 citation statements)

References 97 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

755

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Deception, in the form of deliberate lies or nondeliberate equivocation will in theory provide physiologic change in speech, which differs from baseline (i.e., control) speech patterns [23]. At the same time, equivocation employs the use of adjectives and adverbs in order to qualify the meaning of statements and introduce ambiguity and uncertainty [24].…”

Section: Analysis Of Speech To Assess Stress and Uncertaintymentioning

confidence: 99%

Using Analysis of Speech and Linguistics to Characterize Uncertainty in Radiology Reporting

Reiner

2012

J Digit Imaging

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Analysis Of Speech To Assess Stress and Uncertaintymentioning

confidence: 99%

Using Analysis of Speech and Linguistics to Characterize Uncertainty in Radiology Reporting

Reiner

2012

J Digit Imaging

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In doing so, liars engage in impression management to convince listeners of their honesty (Buller & Burgoon, 1996;Hocking & Leathers, 1980). In particular, liars try to act in ways that are contrary to stereotypical beliefs about deceptive behaviour in order to appear honest .…”

Section: Purported Versus Valid Cues Used To Detect Deceptionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Truth and Deception in Informants' Accounts of Criminal Admissions

Boydell¹

2012

PsycEXTRA Dataset

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Informants who report admissions to crime can be powerful and dangerous players in the criminal justice system. Some informants, such as jailhouse informants, are considered deceitful, in part because they can receive incentives to report criminal admissions. However, little research has examined the nature of information that informants provide. In particular, no recent published research has examined whether there are valid behavioural cues that distinguish deceptive from truthful informants. In addition, no published study to date has explored whether informants' reports and demeanours are affected by the incentives that they receive. Participants in this study either did or did not hear a criminal admission and then were interviewed one week later about details of the admission they had allegedly heard. Some participants were offered an incentive to report the criminal admission in a way that appeared accurate and forthcoming. The results of this study suggest that there may be behavioural cues emitted during the reporting of criminal admissions that distinguish truthful from deceptive informants. However, the direction of differences for some cues may deviate from other types of witnesses to crime. In addition, the findings of this study indicate that being offered an incentive may induce informants to emit cues during the reporting of criminal admissions that make them appear more truthful, regardless of whether or not they are actually telling the truth. The findings of this study raise concerns about whether informants' honesty should be assessed in the same way as other witnesses, and about potentially negative consequences of offering incentives to informants in exchange for their reports of criminal admissions.

show abstract

“…Walther (1996) points out that people take advantage of computer-mediated communication environments to enhance their self-presentation and inflate other people's view about themselves. In addition, Buller & Burgoon (1996) propose Interpersonal Deception Theory, which defines deception as an intentional act in which senders knowingly transmit messages that aim to foster a false belief or interpretation by the receiver. On the other hand, according to some other researchers, deception is not always intentional (e.g., self-deception) (Gardner & Martinko, 1988), (Jones et al, 1962), (A.…”

Section: Fake Identity and Messaging Schemementioning

confidence: 99%

A Survey of Social Network Forensics

Karabiyik¹,

Canbaz²,

Aksoy³

et al. 2016

JDFSL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Social networks in any form, specifically online social networks (OSNs), are becoming a part of our everyday life in this new millennium especially with the advanced and simple communication technologies through easily accessible devices such as smartphones and tablets. The data generated through the use of these technologies need to be analyzed for forensic purposes when criminal and terrorist activities are involved. In order to deal with the forensic implications of social networks, current research on both digital forensics and social networks need to be incorporated and understood. This will help digital forensics investigators to predict, detect and even prevent any criminal activities in different forms. It will also help researchers to develop new models/techniques in the future. This paper provides literature review of the social network forensics methods, models, and techniques in order to provide an overview to the researchers for their future works as well as the law enforcement investigators for their investigations when crimes are committed in the cyber space. It also provides awareness and defense methods for OSN users in order to protect them against to social attacks.

show abstract

Interpersonal Deception Theory

Cited by 891 publications

References 97 publications

Using Analysis of Speech and Linguistics to Characterize Uncertainty in Radiology Reporting

Using Analysis of Speech and Linguistics to Characterize Uncertainty in Radiology Reporting

Truth and Deception in Informants' Accounts of Criminal Admissions

A Survey of Social Network Forensics

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About