2019
DOI: 10.1177/1029864919844809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpersonal entrainment in Indian instrumental music performance: Synchronization and movement coordination relate to tempo, dynamics, metrical and cadential structure

Abstract: Two complementary aspects of interpersonal entrainment – synchronization and movement coordination – are explored in North Indian classical instrumental music, in the auditory and visual domains respectively. Sensorimotor synchronization (SMS) is explored by analysing pairwise asynchronies between the event onsets of instrumental soloists and their tabla accompanists, and the variability of asynchrony by factors including tempo, dynamic level and metrical position is explored. Movement coordination is quantifi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In brief, future studies could test the prediction that shorter instrument sounds (shorter acoustic envelopes) increase synchronization precision, independent of the music's cultural, genre-specific characteristics. The relationship between precision and greater event density (and tempo, where tempi can be compared fairly; see Clayton, Jakubowski & Eerola, 2019) is similarly independent of corpus when melodic sounds are involved. We did not observe this effect for drum-only pairings, however.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In brief, future studies could test the prediction that shorter instrument sounds (shorter acoustic envelopes) increase synchronization precision, independent of the music's cultural, genre-specific characteristics. The relationship between precision and greater event density (and tempo, where tempi can be compared fairly; see Clayton, Jakubowski & Eerola, 2019) is similarly independent of corpus when melodic sounds are involved. We did not observe this effect for drum-only pairings, however.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It is not possible to determine the appropriate beat level-referred to in musicological literature as the ''tactus''-in a completely objective way, which creates problems for comparative analysis. (Within genres however, it is often possible to test for the dependency of asynchrony on tempo: see Clayton, Jakubowski, & Eerola, 2019. ) Our judgement of how fast a piece of music seems to be is also dependent, however, on the rhythmic Interpersonal Entrainment in Music Performance 163 event density (i.e., the number of distinct event onsets per second), and this factor can be estimated objectively.…”
Section: ) Group Asynchronization (A)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A central aim of another of our experiments was to devise a way to capture the dynamics of a singing dyad in order to assess the interaction quality of a hocket performance, focusing on timing (Dell'Anna et al, 2020a). While the main part of studies on timing in pairs of musicians have used some form of correlation of asynchronies or mean signed asynchronies (Goebl and Palmer, 2009;Clayton et al, 2019), the methods remain event-based due to the fact that references that occur are regular time instances, which can be interpreted as subsequent events.…”
Section: Quality: Expressive Timing and Joint Agency In A Hocket Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we explored synchrony from subtle torso movements intending to analyze the temporal and morphological dynamics of the same type of matching behaviors across the conditions. Previous reports indicate that this area of the body is highly sensitive to changes in interactions of participants, which makes it an objective marker of behavioral synchrony [30,[148][149][150][151][152][153][154]. Due to our focus on the torso motion, other behavioral and biological markers sensitive to interactional synchrony were not considered.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%