Interpersonal Perception in Japanese and British Observers

Abstract

We compared performance of Japanese and British observers in deciphering images depicting Japanese interpersonal relationships. 201 Japanese and 215 British subjects were assessed by means of a test consisting of 31 photograph problems accompanied by two or three alternative solutions one of which was correct. Japanese subjects outperformed British subjects on the test overall (z = 3.981, p < 0.001). A two-factor ANOVA (culture x gender) was performed for each of the problems. A cultural effect was found in 17 problems. Surprisingly, British subjects outperformed Japanese subjects in 7 of these problems. There was a gender effect in 4 problems and a culture x gender interaction in 6 problems. The results indicate that cultural experience facilitates nonverbal appraisal of interpersonal relationships, but it may sometimes cause specific errors. Differences in the perceptual cues used suggest that British subjects had difficulty reading Japanese facial expressions.

Equally attending but still not seeing: An eye-tracking study of change detection in own- and other-race faces

“…However, the own-race bias does not only affect recognition memory, but it has been shown to influence other visual processes such as the recognition of emotional facial expressions (e.g. Elfenbein & Ambady 2002Kito & Lee 2004) and the perceptual discrimination of faces in own and other races (e.g. Lindsay, Jack & Christian 1991;Walker & Tanaka 2003).…”

The effects of private and collective self‐priming on visual search: Taking advantage of organized contextual stimuli

“…Although we have no quarrel with this explanation, the present data suggest an additional possibility. To start with, there is evidence that members of collectivist cultures have more accessible collective selves than do members of individualist cultures (Cousins, 1989; Fiske et al , 1998; Kitayama et al , 2000; Kito & Lee, 2004; Markus & Kitayama, 1991, 1998; Singelis, 1994). In addition, the present research demonstrates that a more accessible collective self increases the efficacy of pattern perception.…”

Nonverbal intimacy as a benchmark for human–robot interaction

“…Nonverbal behavior has been described as the pathway to intimacy. Signals from the face, voice, posture, gesture, interpersonal distance and positioning have bodily effects on the other person distinct from linguistic effects (Kito & Lee, 2004). They may amplify, attenuate or contradict speakers' ostensive verbal communications.…”