2020
DOI: 10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.20190030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpersonal Psychotherapy Versus Cognitive Therapy for Depression: How They Work, How Long, and for Whom—Key Findings From an RCT

Abstract: People interested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit the DOI to the publisher's website.• The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review.• The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both treatments performed equally well in reducing suicide ideation, depression, and prevention of reattempts and also performed as well as other well‐established cognitive or dialectical behavior therapies for this population (Esposito‐Smythers et al., 2019; McCauley et al., 2018). Because no treatment differences were found (Diamond et al., 2019), this paper explores if the pathway through which change occurs differs in the two treatments (Lemmens et al., 2020). Specifically, we aimed to explore if treatment adherence in either treatment is associated with outcomes and if alliance contributes to that association.…”
Section: Adherence Process Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both treatments performed equally well in reducing suicide ideation, depression, and prevention of reattempts and also performed as well as other well‐established cognitive or dialectical behavior therapies for this population (Esposito‐Smythers et al., 2019; McCauley et al., 2018). Because no treatment differences were found (Diamond et al., 2019), this paper explores if the pathway through which change occurs differs in the two treatments (Lemmens et al., 2020). Specifically, we aimed to explore if treatment adherence in either treatment is associated with outcomes and if alliance contributes to that association.…”
Section: Adherence Process Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, individuals with relative deficits in domains targeted by ESTEEM, such as social isolation or difficulties with emotion regulation, may have a preferential response to the intervention. On the other hand, CBTs for depression sometimes yield stronger effects when building on an individual’s strengths rather than focusing on areas of deficit (Cheavens et al, 2012; Lemmens et al, 2020; Murphy et al, 2021). Therefore, deficits in these treatment facilitators might be associated with less benefit upon receiving ESTEEM.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to ethical considerations, the 'pre-treatment' measure of the WLC condition was assessed at a different time point than the treatment condition, and therefore comparison was not possible. In line with secondary analyses of the STEPd study, the current study only included the treatment conditions (seeLemmens et al, 2020 for an overview).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%