Interpersonal relationships: students, teachers and librarians in university libraries of Pakistan

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to assess students‐teachers‐librarians interpersonal relationships; and to assess student attitudes towards library staff attitudes, library services and user‐education programmes in the university libraries of Pakistan.Design/methodology/approachA multi‐disciplinary approach is used. Questionnaires and semi‐structured interviews are utilised in the study together with discussions under interview conditions with the experts.FindingsThe literature shows the librarians' slightly negative attitude to relationships, but interestingly students and teachers' responses reveal a much more positive view of support and accessibility by the library staff. The majority of students' written responses point out more positive interpersonal relationships than the literature indicated. Verbal responses show antagonistic attitudes in some cases towards library staff. It is shown that interpersonal relationships are not as disappointing as shown in the literature and the qualitative study of experts' views, but still there is much to be done to improve the meaningfulness of the educational use of the library by improving the interpersonal relationships. It finds the factors affecting the successful interpersonal relationships as: lack of professional training, collaboration and satisfactory working conditions seem to be crucial for the meaningful interpersonal attitude.Research limitations/implicationsThe study examines the interpersonal relationships in the ten university libraries of Pakistan.Practical implicationsThe information can be useful for librarians and information specialists for developing positive working relationships. Librarians can play their role effectively in attracting and educating the users to wealth of information contained in Pakistani libraries.Originality/valueVery few studies on interpersonal relationship have been conducted in Pakistan. The key points that emerge that interpersonal relationships play a major part in developing attitudes towards library services and user education; antagonistic attitudes are evidenced in some cases towards library staff in the verbal responses from students (strongly) and teachers (less strongly). The myth that librarians are uncooperative with students and teachers is not well supported by the research.

Information competency assessment of undergraduates: A Pakistani perspective

“…Few studies have assessed the information competency of Pakistani undergraduate students (Zeeshan et al, 2020). Bhatti (2010) criticizes that most universities offer poorly planned and informal user education programmes without assessing their users' information needs. So, in light of the significance of students' information competency in the knowledge-based economy, this study aims to fill the research gap in the extant literature from the Pakistani perspective.…”

UTILIZATION AND BARRIERS OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES (ICTs) IN FEDERAL COLLEGES OF EDUCATION LIBRARIES IN THE NORTH-WEST, NIGERIA

“…Hence, the usefulness of a college library in any higher education setting cannot be overestimated. However it is important to remember that manual procedures in academic and non-academic libraries' ideas, practices, and services were impacted by the 20th century revolution (Bhatti and Qutab, 2014). Market variables, changes in customer expectations, and most importantly, the growth of electronic information, are among them.…”

“…One of the most distinctive features of the information era is the benefit of continual access to digital information. In addition to communication tools like radio, television, mobile phones, computer and network hardware, and satellite systems, several of these information and communication technologies (ICTs) also offer services and tools for video conferencing and distant learning (Bhatti and Qutab, 2014). Despite the immeasurable benefits of ICT for libraries, there has been no improvement as a result of its introduction and use (Victoria and Anthonia, 2017;Elisha and Library, 2006;Bingimlas, 2009).…”