2008
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1260758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpersonal Trust as Individual Choice With Social Interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16 In other words, it is the probability that two members of a population, chosen at random, do not share the same religious affiliation. For 11 Following the literature, we do not consider the Iranian World Values Survey data as credible (Uslaner, 2002;Bjørnskov, 2007;Singh, 2008). If we include Iran with the 2005 trust score, the negative relationship between RELIMP and trust can, if anything, be expected to be strengthened, since the country's trust measure is low and RELIMP measure high.…”
Section: Data and Empirical Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 In other words, it is the probability that two members of a population, chosen at random, do not share the same religious affiliation. For 11 Following the literature, we do not consider the Iranian World Values Survey data as credible (Uslaner, 2002;Bjørnskov, 2007;Singh, 2008). If we include Iran with the 2005 trust score, the negative relationship between RELIMP and trust can, if anything, be expected to be strengthened, since the country's trust measure is low and RELIMP measure high.…”
Section: Data and Empirical Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%