2012
DOI: 10.1364/ao.51.002877
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpixel crosstalk in Teledyne Imaging Sensors H4RG-10 detectors

Abstract: CMOS-hybrid arrays have become competitive optical detectors for use in ground-and space-based astronomy. Inter-pixel capacitance is one source of error that appears in most CMOS arrays. In this paper we use a single pixel reset method to model inter-pixel capacitance (IPC). We combine this IPC model with a model for charge diffusion to estimate the total crosstalk on H4RG-10 arrays. Finally, we compare our model results to 55 Fe data obtained using an astrometric camera built to test the H4RG-10 B0 generation… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The discrepancy (1.2% versus 2.0%) that we see between the two methods is consistent with the findings of other authors. [28][29][30][31] PEC data from TIS gave a responsive quantum efficiency (RQE) of 65% at 100 mV of reverse bias and in the range from ∼4 to 9 μm, and in addition provided a cutoff wavelength of 10.6 μm at 30 K. It is important to note that these first three arrays did not include antireflection coating, thus 65% is very good (the theoretical maximum value possible is ∼75%). The UR has confirmed both the RQE (at 8 to 9 μm) and the half power cutoff wavelength with photometry of a black felt cloth of known temperature, through a cold pinhole of known dimensions and distance from the array, through a cold circular variable interference filter and a warm dewar window (Appendix).…”
Section: H1rg-16885mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discrepancy (1.2% versus 2.0%) that we see between the two methods is consistent with the findings of other authors. [28][29][30][31] PEC data from TIS gave a responsive quantum efficiency (RQE) of 65% at 100 mV of reverse bias and in the range from ∼4 to 9 μm, and in addition provided a cutoff wavelength of 10.6 μm at 30 K. It is important to note that these first three arrays did not include antireflection coating, thus 65% is very good (the theoretical maximum value possible is ∼75%). The UR has confirmed both the RQE (at 8 to 9 μm) and the half power cutoff wavelength with photometry of a black felt cloth of known temperature, through a cold pinhole of known dimensions and distance from the array, through a cold circular variable interference filter and a warm dewar window (Appendix).…”
Section: H1rg-16885mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some measurements for H4RG-10 HgCdTe arrays indicated α on the order of 8 % resulting coupling out of the central pixel on the order of 35%. 23 If correction of IPC is not performed, this could result in erroneous conclusions and unnecessary imprecision from missions such as WFIRST. In the case of higher couplings, diagonal and second-neighbor couplings can rise to non-negligible levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of higher couplings, diagonal and second-neighbor couplings can rise to non-negligible levels. 23 Figure 18 shows the PSF degradation that would be caused to the F405N WebbPSF in the presence of a static α = 8%. The FWHM would be expected to broaden from 2.080 pixels to 2.249 pixels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several experimental protocols have been used to characterize IPC, some through the illumination of a single pixel with 55 Fe sources 15 or taking advantage of cosmic ray hits, 16 others using electrical charge generation in hot pixels 17 or even through single pixel reset (SPR), a technique using an HxRG dedicated feature allowing the reset of a single pixel to a voltage different from its neighbors, 18 which are reset at 300mV. This latter technique is the only one that can actually decorrelate IPC from charge drifting and allows per pixel IPC coefficients estimation.…”
Section: Derivation Of Ipc Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 99%