2020
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab684e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interplanetary Protons versus Interacting Protons in the 2017 September 10 Solar Eruptive Event

Abstract: We analyze the relativistic proton emission from the Sun during the eruptive event on 2017 September 10, which caused a ground-level enhancement (GLE 72) registered by the worldwide network of neutron monitors. Using the neutron monitor data and interplanetary transport modeling both along and across interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) lines, we deduce parameters of the proton injection into the interplanetary medium. The inferred injection profile of the interplanetary protons is compared with the profile of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The injection of relativistic protons has been assumed to be instantaneous and located near the Sun, which is a reasonable approximation at these energies (Gopalswamy et al 2012). In recently published work, Kocharov et al (2020) presented an analysis of the 2017 September 10 GLE event using a 2D model of particle transport that includes perpendicular diffusion due to magnetic field turbulence. We expect that inclusion of such effects within our 3D model would smooth particle intensity profiles, eliminating discontinuities at low energies that are due to loss of connection to the flux tubes within which acceleration took place, while retaining the important effects of IMF polarity and HCS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The injection of relativistic protons has been assumed to be instantaneous and located near the Sun, which is a reasonable approximation at these energies (Gopalswamy et al 2012). In recently published work, Kocharov et al (2020) presented an analysis of the 2017 September 10 GLE event using a 2D model of particle transport that includes perpendicular diffusion due to magnetic field turbulence. We expect that inclusion of such effects within our 3D model would smooth particle intensity profiles, eliminating discontinuities at low energies that are due to loss of connection to the flux tubes within which acceleration took place, while retaining the important effects of IMF polarity and HCS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high-energy γ-ray flare on 2017 September 10 was observed by Fermi/LAT (Omodei et al 2018;Ajello et al 2021), and the high-energy proton event at 1 au was registered by the ground-based neutron monitor network (Mishev et al 2018;Kocharov et al 2020). The flare-CME eruption was well observed in different electromagnetic emissions, including in particular the microwave (MW) observations by the Expanded Owens Valley Solar Array (EOVSA; Gary et al 2018), the EUV images by the Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (AIA; Lemen et al 2012) on the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO), and the hard X-ray (HXR) observations by RHESSI (Lin et al 2002).…”
Section: High-energy Event Morphology and Associationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A very good agreement of the derived SEP characteristics, specifically fluence and PAD with direct measurements by the PAMELA space-borne detector was achieved. Therefore, this specific method for data analysis of strong SEP events using NM records is verified at least for a single event and gives a good basis for further quantification of solar proton acceleration [32,33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%