2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10509-018-3345-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interplanetary type II radio bursts and their association with CMEs and flares

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 53 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In their analysis of type II burst end frequencies, Vasanth et al (2015) concluded that the lower the emission end frequency, the higher the possibility of having a strong geomagnetic storm near Earth. Shanmugaraju et al (2018) divided the type II bursts into groups by their end frequency: (A) higher than 1 MHz, (B) intermediate, between 1 MHz and 100 kHz, and (C) lower than 100 kHz. Their analysis indicated that there was a correlation between the observed CME height and the estimated type II burst height for groups B and C, but no correlation for group A.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their analysis of type II burst end frequencies, Vasanth et al (2015) concluded that the lower the emission end frequency, the higher the possibility of having a strong geomagnetic storm near Earth. Shanmugaraju et al (2018) divided the type II bursts into groups by their end frequency: (A) higher than 1 MHz, (B) intermediate, between 1 MHz and 100 kHz, and (C) lower than 100 kHz. Their analysis indicated that there was a correlation between the observed CME height and the estimated type II burst height for groups B and C, but no correlation for group A.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%