Constraining the paleogeographic positions and affinities of continental fragments plays a crucial role in validating the concept of the supercontinent cycle (Nance et al., 2014). However, the paleogeographic record of a continental fragment is a complex amalgam of magmatic, deformational, metamorphic, and sedimentary events (e.g., Cawood et al., 2022;Zhao et al., 2018) that results from the reworking of older continental fragments in younger orogenic belts (e.g., the Tibetan Plateau; Kapp & DeCelles, 2019). Tracking the evolving paleogeographic position of these fragments, especially for those of Precambrian age, has proven difficult. This is due in part to the lack of fossils and associated faunal affinities between fragments and the overprinting of possible paleomagnetic and stratigraphic records by younger orogenic systems. Previous studies have tried to solve this problem by detrital zircon U-Pb dating and Hf-isotope analyses (e.g., Hu, Zhai, Zhao, et al., 2018). However, the applicability of such data sets to link the basin in which the detrital zircons accumulated to a specific source from which they were derived is dependent on the uniqueness of the latter; for example, spatially separated sources displaying similar records of tectono-magmatic events limit the ability to link basin to a specific source (e.g., Guo et al., 2017;Zhu et al., 2011), unless other unique criteria can be established.Over the last few decades, there has been an astounding growth in detrital zircon analysis, which has increasingly extended beyond U-Pb and Hf isotopic data to include trace and rare earth elements (REE) (e.g., Zhu et al., 2020). Zircon REE compositions are an important additional data set because they reflect the composition of, and the