2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.105.136601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interplay of Peltier and Seebeck Effects in Nanoscale Nonlocal Spin Valves

Abstract: We have experimentally studied the role of thermoelectric effects in nanoscale nonlocal spin valve devices. A finite element thermoelectric model is developed to calculate the generated Seebeck voltages due to Peltier and Joule heating in the devices. By measuring the first, second, and third harmonic voltage response nonlocally, the model is experimentally examined. The results indicate that the combination of Peltier and Seebeck effects contributes significantly to the nonlocal baseline resistance. Moreover,… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
139
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
139
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…29 The background voltage parabolically increased with increasing bias AC current. From the fitting with the assumption, we obtained a conventional Seebeck coefficient of À22 mV K À1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 The background voltage parabolically increased with increasing bias AC current. From the fitting with the assumption, we obtained a conventional Seebeck coefficient of À22 mV K À1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1a). 26 , a small field-independent background (16 mO here) has been subtracted. Complete and abrupt switching between P and AP is observed, enabling determination of DR NL , the T and d dependence of which allow for extraction of a(T) and l N (T).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This non-local geometry has enabled significant advances in the understanding of spin transport in metals [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]18,22,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] , but has also highlighted serious discrepancies with theory. The primary example of the latter is the surprising non-monotonicity in the temperature (T) dependence of DR NL , and thus the deduced l N , in the transparent interface limit.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This spin current is generated because, in a ferromagnet, the Seebeck effect-which describes the generation of a voltage as a result of a temperature gradient-is spin dependent 13,14 . We studied this new source of spin currents experimentally in a non-local lateral geometry and developed a three-dimensional model that describes the heat, charge and spin transport in this geometry, enabling us to quantify this process 15 . We obtain a spin-dependent Seebeck coefficient for Permalloy of −3.8 µV K −1 , suggesting that thermally driven spin injection is a feasible alternative for electrical spin injection in, for example, spin-transfer-torque experiments 16 .…”
Section: Van Weesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The baseline resistance R 1 b of 90 µ is in line with the calculated 95 µ . This is caused by Peltier heating and cooling of the two current-injecting contacts 15 .The negative regular spin-valve signal R 1 s can be understood as follows. Owing to the high conductivity of the copper, a fraction of the current flows into and out of the Py 1 /Cu interface electrically injecting spins.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%