2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.03.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

INTERPOL survey of the use of speaker identification by law enforcement agencies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Mel domain, the filters are equally spaced in a frequency band [29]. After signal filtering, the DCT (discrete cosine transform) is applied to the logarithm of the above data [30], in order to de-correlate them. Finally, a lifter is applied to obtain the MFCC coefficients.…”
Section: Mfccmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Mel domain, the filters are equally spaced in a frequency band [29]. After signal filtering, the DCT (discrete cosine transform) is applied to the logarithm of the above data [30], in order to de-correlate them. Finally, a lifter is applied to obtain the MFCC coefficients.…”
Section: Mfccmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While both DNNs and GMMs aim at incorporating phonetic information of the phrase with these posteriors, model-based SID approaches ignore the sequence information of the phonetic units of the phrase. SIIP overcomes this problem by applying a dynamic time warping architecture using speaker-informative features [9]. Further, also a combination of SID with other modalities such as with automatic speech recognition or keyword 1 http://www.siip.eu spotting engine allows the use of content information in speaker identification.…”
Section: A Speaker Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent telephone interviews were held with 40 survey respondents. A paper was also submitted and published in the special issue of "Forensic Science International" [9].…”
Section: A Siip Survey Questionnairesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These experts are often phoneticians who have obtained additional training in forensic science, or engineers or computer scientists who have obtained additional training in phonetics and forensic science [14]. World-wide surveys on forensic speech investigation [15,16] show that the most popular approach employed in most countries are auditory analysis, together with acoustic-phonetic analysis. Reich [4] conducted an experiment where two groups of listeners, naive (undergraduate students) and sophisticated (doctoral students and professors in speech and hearing sciences), discriminated disguised and undisguised speech created by forty male speakers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%