2007
DOI: 10.1063/1.2805084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpolating moving least-squares methods for fitting potential energy surfaces: Improving efficiency via local approximants

Abstract: The local interpolating moving least-squares (IMLS) method for constructing potential energy surfaces is investigated. The method retains the advantageous features of the IMLS approach in that the ab initio derivatives are not required and high degree polynomials can be used to provide accurate fits, while at the same time it is much more efficient than the standard IMLS approach because the least-squares solutions need to be calculated only once at the data points. Issues related to the implementation of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22 There exists also a variant of the IMLS method that does not require to solve the least-squares equations for every evaluation point via local approximants. 27 The local interpolation moving least-squares method (L-IMLS) requires to calculate at every ab initio data point, the set of coefficients {a i }, which results in an N 3 m matrix. At every evaluation point, it is then simply necessary to calculate a weighted average over the coefficients of the data points near the evaluation point.…”
Section: Constructing the Potential Energy Surface: Interpolating Movmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 There exists also a variant of the IMLS method that does not require to solve the least-squares equations for every evaluation point via local approximants. 27 The local interpolation moving least-squares method (L-IMLS) requires to calculate at every ab initio data point, the set of coefficients {a i }, which results in an N 3 m matrix. At every evaluation point, it is then simply necessary to calculate a weighted average over the coefficients of the data points near the evaluation point.…”
Section: Constructing the Potential Energy Surface: Interpolating Movmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weights w i (Z) dictate the effective range at which a given ab initio point will contribute to the global fit and the effective contribution to the fit. We use Guo et al's [37] form of the weight function, which introduces a cutoff function S(χ) to the unnormalized weight function v i ( Z − i ) so as to smoothly go to zero at a given cutoff radius R cut . The cutoff function is given [37] by…”
Section: Surface Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use Guo et al's [37] form of the weight function, which introduces a cutoff function S(χ) to the unnormalized weight function v i ( Z − i ) so as to smoothly go to zero at a given cutoff radius R cut . The cutoff function is given [37] by…”
Section: Surface Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process we have described is the local interpolating moving least squares (L-IMLS) approach. The term L-IMLS and its application to PES fitting in physical chemistry are due to Dawes et al 7 and Guo et al, 11 who developed the method for systems of higher dimensionality. Their research makes use of weight functions similar to those in Eqs.…”
Section: Global and Local Fitting In One Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 In the present paper, we describe an alternate strategy, which we pursued concurrently, for fitting a six-dimensional surface to the tetranitrogen dataset. Our approach is a new version of the local interpolating moving least squares (L-IMLS) method, as investigated by Dawes et al [7][8][9][10] and Guo et al, 11 with three improvements. (1) Our method treats pairwise interactions separately from many-body interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%