1980
DOI: 10.1007/bf00346814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpopulation variation in nectar production in Aconitum columbianum (Ranunculaceae)

Abstract: In Aconitum columbianum there are extreme interpopulation differences in rates of nectar secretion per flower. Since nectar sugar concentration varies little among populations, increased nectar secretion results in a greater mass of sugar per flower for pollinator attraction. These differences in the amount of reward offered per flower account at least in part for observed higher levels of pollinator activity in populations with high nectar production. Nectar production is correlated also with nectary depth, i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1
2

Year Published

1982
1982
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
14
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus "visit more flowers" did not seem to work in this species. Brink and deWet (1980) did not observe any correlation between the length of corolla tube and the proportion of nectarless flowers as predicted by the Bell (1986) model. Smithson and Gigord (2001) showed that bumble bees spent more time searching on rewardless flowers resulting in a male advantage.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…Thus "visit more flowers" did not seem to work in this species. Brink and deWet (1980) did not observe any correlation between the length of corolla tube and the proportion of nectarless flowers as predicted by the Bell (1986) model. Smithson and Gigord (2001) showed that bumble bees spent more time searching on rewardless flowers resulting in a male advantage.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 47%
“…frequently correlated with the size of the floral reward (nectar and/or pollen) [5,10,16,51,54]. Furthermore, foragers tend to select and visit more flowers on plants or patches with large floral display sizes in order to reduce travel times between flowers [3,22,23,32,46,47].…”
Section: Does Size Matter? Bumblebee Behaviour and The Pollination Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En ce qui concerne la concentration totale en sucres, Free (1955), Pouvreau (1974), Corbet (1978) et Eickwort et Ginsberg (1980) (Bigras-Huot et al, 1973;Roberts, 1978;Cane et al, 1985;Mohr et Kevan, 1987) (Roberts, 1978;Pleasants, 1983), la localisation de la fleur (Hocking, 1968;Pleasants, 1983), la taille de cette fleur (Brink et de Wet, 1980), la taille de la plante (Harder, 1985), la localisation de l'individu (Zimmermann et Pyke, 1988), le moment dans la journée (Corbet et al, 1979), les conditions climatiques (Hocking, 1968;Southwick et al, 1981), le prélèvement par des pollinisateurs (Corbet et al, 1979;Pleasants, 1981) …”
Section: Concentrations Totales En Sucres Optimalesunclassified