2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10211-011-0104-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpopulational variation of the mating system in the peacock blenny Salaria pavo

Abstract: The ecology and mating system of two populations of the peacock blenny Salaria pavo that have been reported to differ in sexual behaviour were studied. In the Gulf of Trieste, a northern Adriatic Sea population lives in rocky shores, whilst in the Ria Formosa, an Atlantic population inhabits a coastal lagoon with sandy barrier islands. In the Gulf of Trieste, nest availability was found to be higher and nest aggregation lower than in Ria Formosa. Nesting males courted females more and in higher proportion, and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the artificial conditions provided by human farming activities, it is likely that the most successful phenotypes of farmed animals are different from those under natural conditions. However, that does not mean that these selected phenotypes carry differential genotypes, especially due to phenotypic plasticity which is remarkably relevant in fish: different populations of the same species present contrasting yet plastic behavioural responses to environmental and social conditions [32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. Nevertheless, artificial selection experiments demonstrate that almost any quantitative trait could be permanently altered, that responses (mostly) occurred as a consequence of changes in the frequencies of genes affecting the traits, and not from mutations, and that many genes must be involved [39,40].…”
Section: Genesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the artificial conditions provided by human farming activities, it is likely that the most successful phenotypes of farmed animals are different from those under natural conditions. However, that does not mean that these selected phenotypes carry differential genotypes, especially due to phenotypic plasticity which is remarkably relevant in fish: different populations of the same species present contrasting yet plastic behavioural responses to environmental and social conditions [32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. Nevertheless, artificial selection experiments demonstrate that almost any quantitative trait could be permanently altered, that responses (mostly) occurred as a consequence of changes in the frequencies of genes affecting the traits, and not from mutations, and that many genes must be involved [39,40].…”
Section: Genesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Saraiva et al . ). Nest‐holder males are larger and older, and express a suite of secondary sex characters, namely a head crest and an anal gland that produces a sex pheromone (Gonçalves et al .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The S. pavo population studied inhabits the intertidal zone of a coastal lagoon in the south of Portugal. In this population, two reproductive phenotypes are present: nest-holders and sneakers (Gonc ßalves et al 1996;Saraiva et al 2012). Nest-holder males are larger and older, and express a suite of secondary sex characters, namely a head crest and an anal gland that produces a sex pheromone (Gonc ßalves et al 1996;Serrano et al 2008).…”
Section: S T U D Y S P E C I E Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, subordinate males may maintain their female-like morphology and reproduce as parasitic males. This might explain why the frequency of parasitic males is higher in populations with a shortage and aggregation of nest sites [60], as these conditions are likely to increase the frequency of subordinate juveniles. 11-KT, most likely secreted by the testicular glands, seems to be responsible for the conversion of the dominance status to the expression of SSC but exactly which neuroendocrine mechanisms promote the development of testicular glands remains a crucial question.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%