2018
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpregnancy weight change and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: ObjectivesTo evaluate the effect of interpregnancy body mass index (BMI) change on pregnancy outcomes, including large-for-gestational-age babies (LGA), small-for-gestational-age babies (SGA), macrosomia, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and caesarean section (CS).DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis of observational cohort studies.Data sourcesLiterature searches were performed across Cochrane, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Global Health and MIDIRS databases.Study selectionObservational cohort studies with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
69
2
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
8
69
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, given the limitations of this initial study, additional, larger studies are needed to confirm the association with IPC‐BMI and ultimately to establish (or refute) a causal relationship between spina bifida and maternal BMI. While studies of IPC‐BMI are relatively new, and the best approaches for assessing this variable are still evolving (Benjamin et al, ; Oteng‐Ntim et al, ), additional studies of IPC‐BMI and spina bifida are strongly warranted, since maternal pre‐pregnancy BMI is a potentially modifiable risk factor that could serve as a target for spina bifida prevention efforts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, given the limitations of this initial study, additional, larger studies are needed to confirm the association with IPC‐BMI and ultimately to establish (or refute) a causal relationship between spina bifida and maternal BMI. While studies of IPC‐BMI are relatively new, and the best approaches for assessing this variable are still evolving (Benjamin et al, ; Oteng‐Ntim et al, ), additional studies of IPC‐BMI and spina bifida are strongly warranted, since maternal pre‐pregnancy BMI is a potentially modifiable risk factor that could serve as a target for spina bifida prevention efforts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IPC-BMI, assessed based on linked records (e.g., birth certificates from successive pregnancies), has now been evaluated in studies of several BMI-related pregnancy outcomes, including birth defects (e.g., Benjamin et al, 2019;Bogaerts et al, 2013;McBain, Dekker, Clifton, Mol, & Grzeskowiak, 2016;Oteng-Ntim et al, 2018;Riley et al, 2016;Villamor, Sparen, & Cnattingius, 2008;Wallace, Bhattacharya, & Horgan, 2017). However, to our knowledge, an association between IPC-BMI and spina bifida has not been investigated.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to these new criteria, worldwide prevalence is 18%, ranging from 9 to 25% depending on the population studied [ 3 ]. High pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) is a major risk factor for GDM [ 4 ], and for this reason the obesity epidemic has spurred a parallel increase in the frequency of GDM. In North America, the rise in obesity was highest among women of reproductive age [ 5 ], with current rates at 30% in vulnerable populations [ 6 ].…”
Section: Prevalence and Pathophysiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eine kürzlich veröffentlichte Metaanalyse [11] fand Belege für ein höheres Risiko für Entwicklungsstörungen sowie für Verhaltens-und emotionale Störungen bei Kindern von Müttern mit Adipositas. Eine exzessive Gewichtszunahme in der Schwangerschaft in Verbindung mit einer hohen Gewichtsretention nach der Geburt geht zudem mit einem erhöhten Risiko für Schwangerschafts-und Geburtskomplikationen in nachfolgenden Schwanger-schaften [12,13] sowie für Adipositas der Mutter im späteren Lebensalter [14] einher.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified