2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2008.08.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretability constraints for fuzzy information granulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
109
0
13

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 133 publications
(195 reference statements)
0
109
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…The implementation was developed with the "Fuzzy" toolbox (v. To represent the semantic of the interior (extreme) labels of all domains, triangular (trapezoidal) fuzzy numbers (TFNs) were considered, since many authors consider them robust enough to linguistically express the ambiguous valuations given by the sources of information [85]. Regarding the design, strong fuzzy partitions were chosen [86], as they prove to be optimal in terms of comprehensibility by satisfying important semantics constraints as distinguishability, normalization, coverage or overlapping [87].…”
Section: Fuzzy Inference System (Fis)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The implementation was developed with the "Fuzzy" toolbox (v. To represent the semantic of the interior (extreme) labels of all domains, triangular (trapezoidal) fuzzy numbers (TFNs) were considered, since many authors consider them robust enough to linguistically express the ambiguous valuations given by the sources of information [85]. Regarding the design, strong fuzzy partitions were chosen [86], as they prove to be optimal in terms of comprehensibility by satisfying important semantics constraints as distinguishability, normalization, coverage or overlapping [87].…”
Section: Fuzzy Inference System (Fis)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(iii) Preference assessment {Si} from the experts for each proposed structure (see Table 6). (iv) In each structure, aggregate all the expert estimations (e.g., through the "Extended Arithmetic Mean (EAM)", taking as values the order of labels in the scale {Si} [87]. Example: EAM (Struc_1) = (0 × 0 + 1 × 2 + 2 × 2)/4 = 1.5).…”
Section: Fuzzy Inference System (Fis)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, while designing an interpretable fuzzy model the data domain is represented through linguistic variables (usually one for each data feature); given a linguistic variable, the fuzzy sets associated to each linguistic term form a fuzzy partition of the data feature. To ensure interpretability, a number of constraints are imposed on the fuzzy sets of each fuzzy partition, like distinguishability, coverage, special elements, and so on [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cuts can be conveniently used to define the bounds of the 0.5-cuts of the fuzzy sets in a fuzzy partition 1 . More specifically, given a collection of cuts, a SFP can be defined so that the 0.5-cuts of the fuzzy sets in the partition coincide with the intervals bounded by the cuts (see fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the interpretability and due to its subjective nature and the large amount of factors involved, the choice of appropriate measures is still an open problem 21,28,[30][31][32][33][34] . In the specialist literature, there are proposal of different measures 27,28,[30][31][32][33][34] and techniques [8][9][10]22,23,[35][36][37] for obtaining more interpretable linguistic fuzzy models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%