2023
DOI: 10.1186/s40644-023-00594-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretability of radiomics models is improved when using feature group selection strategies for predicting molecular and clinical targets in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma: insights from the TRACERx Renal study

Abstract: Background The aim of this work is to evaluate the performance of radiomics predictions for a range of molecular, genomic and clinical targets in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and demonstrate the impact of novel feature selection strategies and sub-segmentations on model interpretability. Methods Contrast-enhanced CT scans from the first 101 patients recruited to the TRACERx Renal Cancer study (NCT03226886) were used to deri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Determining the interpretability of radiomics features is somewhat subjective; for instance, features linked to tumor shape can be easily comprehended by non-experts, while those rooted in voxel grey-level distributions necessitate specialist knowledge, and texture-related features are challenging to understand, even for image processing experts [ 61 ]. Based on our findings, ( Table S1 ), the most predictive Delta radiomics features in our study are: PET features including GLSZM (Normalized grey level non-uniformity), GLCM (difference average, correlation, normalized inverse difference moment), GLRLM (grey level non-uniformity), Intensity histogram (root mean square and uniformity), local intensity based (coefficient of variation, intensity peak discretized volume sought), CT features including GLSZM (zone size entropy), GLCM (Sum Entropy, Zone size entropy), local intensity based (intensity peak discretized volume sought), and the innermost RIM features in PET image.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determining the interpretability of radiomics features is somewhat subjective; for instance, features linked to tumor shape can be easily comprehended by non-experts, while those rooted in voxel grey-level distributions necessitate specialist knowledge, and texture-related features are challenging to understand, even for image processing experts [ 61 ]. Based on our findings, ( Table S1 ), the most predictive Delta radiomics features in our study are: PET features including GLSZM (Normalized grey level non-uniformity), GLCM (difference average, correlation, normalized inverse difference moment), GLRLM (grey level non-uniformity), Intensity histogram (root mean square and uniformity), local intensity based (coefficient of variation, intensity peak discretized volume sought), CT features including GLSZM (zone size entropy), GLCM (Sum Entropy, Zone size entropy), local intensity based (intensity peak discretized volume sought), and the innermost RIM features in PET image.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 25 We applied a recently developed pipeline designed to improve model interpretability compared with standard radiomics pipelines. 16 Furthermore, our novel sub-segmentation method attempted to address the often heterogeneous radiological phenotypes of retroperitoneal sarcoma seen on CT and our method using fixed thresholds for sub-region segmentation makes it more likely to be reproducible. 26 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recently developed machine learning pipeline was used, which is designed to discover models that are easier to interpret 16 ( appendix pp 3–5, 16 ). The pipeline is based on a nested cross-validation structure, where the outer cross-validation provides performance estimates (ie, area under the receiver operator curve [AUROC]), and the inner cross-validation is used for tuning variable optimisation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET)/CT using different radiolabeled molecules such as 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose, 124 I-cG250, radiolabeled prostate-specific membrane antigen, and 11 C-acetate, together with a computational approach to CT images, are unveiling some data; however, in the opinion of the authors, these data still require standardization and external validation before their integration into clinical practice. In this sense, recent research proposes two new feature selection strategies in the interpretation of radiomics studies to predict molecular and clinical targets in CCRCC [17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%