2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-96071-5_170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretability of Surround Shapes Around Safety Symbols: Cross-Cultural Differences Among Migrant Farmworkers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, a study by Liu et al [14] reported no significant changes in safety sign comprehension for participants who were familiar with machinery, while on the other hand, a number of studies remarked on the influence of previous exposure to pictorials on comprehension performance [22,23]. Studies involving groups of participants from different cultures [24] showed that people from different countries gave different interpretations of the same symbol, threatening the supposed cross-cultural comprehensibility of pictorials [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, a study by Liu et al [14] reported no significant changes in safety sign comprehension for participants who were familiar with machinery, while on the other hand, a number of studies remarked on the influence of previous exposure to pictorials on comprehension performance [22,23]. Studies involving groups of participants from different cultures [24] showed that people from different countries gave different interpretations of the same symbol, threatening the supposed cross-cultural comprehensibility of pictorials [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the proper understanding and comprehensibility of such signs, as well as the accurate communication of the intended message, have become increasingly important over time. Numerous studies (Easterby & Hakiel, 1981;Brelsford et al, 1994;Wogalter et al, 1997;Blake Huer, 2000;Piamonte et al, 2001;Smith-Jackson & Essuman-Johnson, 2002;Arphorn et al, 2003;Lesch, 2003;Shinar et al, 2003;Hancock et al, 2004;Liu et al, 2005;Chan et al, 2009;Lesch et al, 2009Lesch et al, , 2011Chan & Ng, 2010b;Ng et al, 2011;Cavalcanti & Soares, 2012;Liu & Ho, 2012;Yazdani et al, 2017;Bagagiolo et al, 2018Bagagiolo et al, , 2019Alara et al, 2019;Güngör, 2023) have been conducted in this regard. They provide directional insights.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Educational level [ 7 , 8 ] and prior training [ 3 , [9] , [10] , [11] , [12] , [13] ] also improved comprehension levels. The effects of cultural differences on comprehension of graphic symbols have been demonstrated by several researchers [ [14] , [15] , [16] , [17] , [18] , [19] , [20] , [21] , [22] , [23] , [24] ]. The design characteristics of a sign (i.e., color, shape, pictogram, size, visibility, readability, and comprehensibility, as well as the placement, illumination, and maintenance of the sign) and working conditions (i.e., dust, chemicals and fumes in the air, precipitation, time pressure, and performing multiple tasks simultaneously) can also affect the comprehensibility of a sign.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%