2012
DOI: 10.1080/13548506.2011.644247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretation and misinterpretation of warning signage: Perceptions of rockfalls in a naturalistic setting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effectiveness of educational messaging is also limited because it is an indirect management approach. Visitors may not notice signage, have limited interests in reading the signage, or interpret the sign incorrectly (Aucote et al 2012;McNamara and Prideaux 2010). Moreover, on-site educational messaging alone does not provide a long-term solution to recreationists' detrimental behaviors, such as walking off-trail (Alder 1996).…”
Section: The Use Of Educational Messaging To Promote Responsible Hikimentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The effectiveness of educational messaging is also limited because it is an indirect management approach. Visitors may not notice signage, have limited interests in reading the signage, or interpret the sign incorrectly (Aucote et al 2012;McNamara and Prideaux 2010). Moreover, on-site educational messaging alone does not provide a long-term solution to recreationists' detrimental behaviors, such as walking off-trail (Alder 1996).…”
Section: The Use Of Educational Messaging To Promote Responsible Hikimentioning
confidence: 97%
“…61 Smaller community approaches that have undergone some level of evaluation include warning signs at certain visitor locations, such as at the Mount Cougal waterfall/rock pool, or at coastal cliff faces. 62,63 At these locations, warning signs were found to improve knowledge about the risks, which either deterred people from swimming and/ or being around risky areas, but did not always translate to behaviour change or influence their choices. It is unlike that safety campaigns can change mass behaviour, however, they are a useful outlet to provide information about risks.…”
Section: Implications For Public Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, there is the potential for repeat visitors to become 'sign blind' (i.e. no longer notice the controls in place; Greeson & Jurin, 2012) or for tourists to misinterpret signage messaging (Aucote et al, 2012). Additionally, locals tend to gain a sense of ownership of these areas (McKercher, 1996), which both sites, marking overall changes in the behaviours of even those visitors who refused to stop feeding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies aiming to test the general effectiveness of these controls in human–wildlife feeding interactions have relied heavily upon zoo‐based data (Parker et al, 2018; rather than in‐field studies) and visitor opinion polls and surveys (Hockett & Hall, 2007; Mallick & Driessen, 2003) for results. However, visitor surveys and questionnaires may carry a degree of unreliability due to the risk of bias, inaccurate recollection and dishonesty in responses (Aucote et al, 2012; Choi & Pak, 2005). It has, therefore, been advised that direct, in‐field observations be utilised preferentially to ensure that the true effect on visitor behaviour be extracted (Marion et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%