2016
DOI: 10.1111/phn.12277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretation of Ecological Theory for Physical Activity with the Omaha System

Abstract: Physical inactivity is a global health problem. Public health nurses (PHNs) have great potential to influence population health outcomes in this area. However, methods are needed to increase understanding of the problem and the impact PHNs may have on measuring and changing health behavior. One promising option is PHN documentation of client health data. However, literature examining how health behavior theories align with nursing documentation systems that use standardized terminology is sparse. The purpose o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ecological model for health promotion (McLeroy et al, ) was used to guide this study. The model recognizes the influence of the social–ecological environment on health behaviors and was operationalized with the Omaha System using a process described in prior studies (Olsen, Horning, et al, ; Olsen et al, ; Olsen, Thorson, et al, ). In summary, the intrapersonal, interpersonal, and community levels of the model were aligned with the Physiological, Psychosocial, and Environmental domains and problems of the Omaha System Problem Classification Scheme, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ecological model for health promotion (McLeroy et al, ) was used to guide this study. The model recognizes the influence of the social–ecological environment on health behaviors and was operationalized with the Omaha System using a process described in prior studies (Olsen, Horning, et al, ; Olsen et al, ; Olsen, Thorson, et al, ). In summary, the intrapersonal, interpersonal, and community levels of the model were aligned with the Physiological, Psychosocial, and Environmental domains and problems of the Omaha System Problem Classification Scheme, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ecological model for health promotion (McLeroy et al, 1988) was used to guide this study. The model recognizes the influence of the social-ecological environment on health behaviors and was operationalized with the Omaha System using a process described in prior studies (Olsen, Horning, et al, 2017;Olsen et al, 2018;Olsen, Thorson, et al, 2017) (1), severe sign/symptoms (2), moderate sign/symptoms (3), minimal sign/symptoms (4), and no sign/symptoms (5) (Martin, 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two well‐established frameworks were reported upon the Omaha system interventions: teaching, guidance and counselling; treatments and procedures; case management and surveillance (Olsen, Baisch, & Monsen, 2017) and the Public Health Intervention Wheel: policy development; social marketing; advocacy; community organising; coalition building; collaboration; consultation; screening and outreach (Schaffer, Anderson, & Rising, 2016). These frameworks were identified as robust guides for public health nursing practice, and the recording infrastructure behind these systems was considered a strength to the future measurement of outcomes from public health nursing interventions (Olsen et al, 2017; Schaffer et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were especially important in initially engaging clients as it was recognised that many of the groups PHNs work with often do not access services and are variously described as “hard to reach” or “seldom heard” (Cotton, 2015; Noonan, Galvin, Doody, & Jomeen, 2017). Once engagement has been achieved, encouraging sustained contact and motivating clients to make lifestyle changes were also viewed as a relationship‐building skill needed by the public health nurse (Astbury, Shepherd, & Cheyne, 2017; Olsen et al, 2017; Riding, Glendening, & Heaslip, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We preprocessed the corpus using standard preprocessing methods [22]. First excess whitespace and non-text characters were removed.…”
Section: Data Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%