2007
DOI: 10.1128/aac.00481-06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretation of Genotype and Pharmacokinetics for Resistance to Fosamprenavir-Ritonavir-Based Regimens in Antiretroviral-Experienced Patients

Abstract: In this study, named the Zephir study (Telzir-pharmacokinetics), 121 antiretroviral-experienced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) patients failing on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) were included in a prospective cohort and received a fosamprenavir-ritonavir (700 mg/100 mg twice a day)-based regimen. The impact of baseline HIV type 1 (HIV-1) mutations, pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, and genotype inhibitory quotient (GIQ) on the virological response at week 12 (W12) was assessed. HIV reverse tra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The M36I mutation is the only polymorphic mutation in the C-SA protease that is associated with drug resistance to most of the FDAapproved PIs in combination with ritonavir [41]. This mutation is associated with virological failure or a reduced virological response to atazanavir, darunavir, fosamprenavir, indinavir, lopinavir, saquinavir and tipranavir in combination with ritonavir [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49]. Mutations at residue position 89 are associated with virological failure to darunavir and tipranavir in combination with ritonavir [44,50], and mutations at resi- In the subtype B protease (A) (PDB ID: 2PC0 [13]), M36 appears to provide anchorage for E35, and stabilizes the salt bridge between E35 and R57.…”
Section: Effect Of Secondary Resistance Mutations On Flap Movementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The M36I mutation is the only polymorphic mutation in the C-SA protease that is associated with drug resistance to most of the FDAapproved PIs in combination with ritonavir [41]. This mutation is associated with virological failure or a reduced virological response to atazanavir, darunavir, fosamprenavir, indinavir, lopinavir, saquinavir and tipranavir in combination with ritonavir [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49]. Mutations at residue position 89 are associated with virological failure to darunavir and tipranavir in combination with ritonavir [44,50], and mutations at resi- In the subtype B protease (A) (PDB ID: 2PC0 [13]), M36 appears to provide anchorage for E35, and stabilizes the salt bridge between E35 and R57.…”
Section: Effect Of Secondary Resistance Mutations On Flap Movementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polymorphic sites of the subtype B protease (PDB ID: 2PC0) [13] and the C-SA protease (PDB ID: 3U71) [37]. The flexible flaps of the protease (residues at positions [46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54] are coloured cyan. The fulcrum region (residues at positions 10-23), hinge region (residues at positions 35-42 and 57-61) and cantilever region (residues at positions 62-78) are implicated in flap opening.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most frequent, L90M and others including G48V (9.0%) and I84V (7.1%) are contraindications to the use of saquinavir associated with ritonavir (SQV/r) (32)(33)(34). The mutations I84V (7.1%), V32I (4.0%), I47V (1.6%), and I54L (0.8%), are contraindications to the use of fosamprenavir associated with ritonavir (FSP/r) (35)(36)(37). The number of licensed PI antiretroviral drug class has expanded and the number of mutations associated with PI resistance is higher when compared with other antiretroviral drug classes.…”
Section: ------------------------------------------------------------mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The protease mutations selected in vitro or in vivo in the presence of amprenavir (I50V, V32I plus I47V, I54LM/M, and I84V) (13) are rarely selected in patients treated by first-line FPV-containing regimens, particularly when boosted with ritonavir (RTV) (12,22). In PIexperienced patients, few data are available concerning the prediction of virological response to FPV/r by genotypic resistance analysis (2,17,20). Recently, the ANRS proposed a genotypic interpretation algorithm for FPV/r including a genotypic score (L10F/I/V, L33F, M36I, I54L/M/V/A/T/S, I62V, V82A/F/C/G, I84V, and L90M) and the presence or absence of the mutations I50V or V32I plus I47V/A as an independent predictor of virological response in 73 PI-experienced patients (17).…”
Section: The Aim Of This Study Was To Identify Human Immunodeficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%