1995
DOI: 10.1006/jmrb.1995.1069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretation of Magnetization Transfer and Proton Cross-Relaxation Spectra of Biological Tissues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
32
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the MT effects of the other samples increase with increasing concentration of agarose. Furthermore, smaller MT effects are observed in the samples doped with MnCl 2 because of their shorter T 1 values [18]. Above all, these results prove an excellent agreement (within 3%) between the measurements collected by the FFC-MTC and the RF-MTC methods.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…In contrast, the MT effects of the other samples increase with increasing concentration of agarose. Furthermore, smaller MT effects are observed in the samples doped with MnCl 2 because of their shorter T 1 values [18]. Above all, these results prove an excellent agreement (within 3%) between the measurements collected by the FFC-MTC and the RF-MTC methods.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…It is similar in concept to the three-pool models developed by Tessier (19) for describing multipool MT and Woessner who studied PARACEST agents with multiple labile groups (20). Although some cases necessitate the inclusion of more than one MT pool (19,(21)(22)(23)), we chose here to limit the number of MT pools to one as it is sufficient to describe MT effects in agar (17). The framework of the model used in this article is illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that GC is due to collagen 1 H of restricted mobility [25], for which a Gaussian line shape is usually assumed [30,31]. The LLC signal, coming from 1 H with higher mobility, is due to the water and fat 1 H in the bone.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%