2003
DOI: 10.1134/1.1618997
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretation of orbital light curves of U Geminorum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
34
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Roche lobe overflow usually leads to an accretion disk and wind. Long-term observation revealed precession effects in the Voptical light curve (see Khruzina & Cherepashchuk 1983), which can be interpreted as an indication of a disk component in accretion flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Roche lobe overflow usually leads to an accretion disk and wind. Long-term observation revealed precession effects in the Voptical light curve (see Khruzina & Cherepashchuk 1983), which can be interpreted as an indication of a disk component in accretion flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This region, called hot line, is a result of the interaction of the disk halo and the inter-component envelope with the gas stream and allows one to fit the whole light curves of the nova-like stars, including the variability of their out-of-eclipse parts (Khruzina 2001;Khruzina et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highest accuracy for the black hole mass is claimed by Gelino et al (2001b) and Khruzina et al (2003): M bh = 6.95 ± 0.6 M and M bh = 7.15 ± 0.45 M , respectively. Gelino et al (2001b) estimate the distance as 5.1 kpc or even 5.9 kpc (Gelino 2004).…”
Section: Distance To Grs 1124-68mentioning
confidence: 95%