Interpretation of seismic data and numerical modelling of fault reactivation at El Teniente, Reservas Norte sector

Potvin, Yves; Troncoso, Juan Jarufe; Wesseloo, Johan

doi:10.36487/acg_rep/1002_33_potvin

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The observed discrepancy in calculated versus recorded moments can be due to more structures (with the same general orientation) being activated in reality, thus contributing to the seismic moment recorded for the group of clusters belonging to each structure. The results from the parametric study can still be interpreted qualitatively and compared with each other (similar to what was done by Potvin et al , 2010).…”

Section: Model Verification and Sensitivity Studiessupporting

confidence: 68%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Numerical analysis of alternative mining sequences to minimise potential for fault slip rockbursting

Sjöberg¹,

Perman²,

Quinteiro

et al. 2012

Mining Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mining in the production area Block 19 in the LKAB Kiirunavaara Mine has resulted in extensive seismic activity and several serious rockfalls. This paper describes a modelling study aimed at quantifying the seismic potential for future mining of Block 19, considering several different mining sequences. A three-dimensional discontinuum model was used, in which geological structures were included explicitly to simulate the development of fault slip seismic events. Four different mining sequences were simulated: three of which involved leaving the whole, or part of, Block 19 as an unmined pillar. Mining was simulated from the current active mining level and for a production period of .20 years ahead in time. The results were evaluated in terms of stress influences on critical infrastructure in the footwall of Block 19 and, more importantly, the possible extent of fault slip seismic events due to mining (by calculating seismic moments). The results showed that leaving a pillar in Block 19 may be less desirable as higher seismic moments will develop in the final mining stages. However, continued mining without a pillar will also likely result in an increased seismic activity in Block 19, which needs to be addressed appropriately. Block 19 should be mined before the neighbouring production areas, but additional and more detailed numerical modelling may be needed to fine-tune the extraction sequence for each level mined.

show abstract

Section: Model Verification and Sensitivity Studiessupporting

confidence: 68%

“…Hildyard et al (2006) noted that the cumulative seismic moment was a representative measure of the total seismic deformation. Potvin et al (2010) and Hofmann (2010) used such an approach and calibrated the results against measured seismic moments (from the seismic monitoring system of a mine).…”

Section: General Approachmentioning

confidence: 99%