1996
DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.1996.271.4.r1009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretation of sham feeding data: curve-shift studies

Abstract: We explored the possibility that quantitative analysis of the relationship between sucrose concentration and sham intake differentiated how various treatments affected the intake of sweet solutions. Rats were sham fed sucrose solutions varying in concentration from 0.03125 to 1.5 M. Under different treatment conditions, intake concentration functions were generated that plotted amount sham fed against sucrose concentration. Sucrose concentration that yielded 50% maximal sham intake were calculated to indicate … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The expansion of a to include satiation is detailed in Killeen (1995). Changes in arousal as animals satiate can be predicted as a function of time in session, by including as parameters the effects ofthe amount or quality of an incentive (see, e.g., Weingarten, Duong, & Elston, 1996), the hunger drive, the initial deprivation level, and the threshold level of motivation that is required for responding to be initiated. Figure 4 illustrates the manner in which the response rate changes within sessions as a function ofdifferent reinforcer types and amounts.…”
Section: -Min Blocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expansion of a to include satiation is detailed in Killeen (1995). Changes in arousal as animals satiate can be predicted as a function of time in session, by including as parameters the effects ofthe amount or quality of an incentive (see, e.g., Weingarten, Duong, & Elston, 1996), the hunger drive, the initial deprivation level, and the threshold level of motivation that is required for responding to be initiated. Figure 4 illustrates the manner in which the response rate changes within sessions as a function ofdifferent reinforcer types and amounts.…”
Section: -Min Blocksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among laboratory animals, increased appetitive responding toward various drugs of abuse has repeatedly been demonstrated in chronically food-restricted animals (Cabeza de Vaca & Carr, 1998), as has been speculated to put food-restricted people at risk of binge eating episodes (Carr, 2016). In the animal model of sham feeding, reducing the duration of food deprivation limits the duration of intake, supporting a relationship at least between short-term food restriction and drive for sweet reward (Weingarten, Duong, & Elston, 1996). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%