1982
DOI: 10.1107/s002188988201259x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretation of small-angle scattering curves proportional to a negative power of the scattering vector

Abstract: The intensity of the small-angle X-ray and neutron scattering from a polydisperse system of randomly oriented independently scattering particles is shown to be proportional to h -" for all values of the scattering vector h when the distribution of particle dimensions is proportional to r -t2d+ 1 -~), where h =4rc2 -1 sin(0/2); 0 is the scattering angle; 2 is the wavelength; r is the maximum dimension of a particle; and d is the number of dimensions of the particles. The value of 0¢ lies in the interval 0<~ Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

6
90
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
6
90
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…15). There being no explanation for slopes in this range, Schmidt (1982) first ascribed the scattering to a power-law size distribution of pores, since this gives a power-law scattering function. Later, Bale & Schmidt (1984) presented an alternative explanation -that the pores have fractally rough surfaces.…”
Section: Surface and Pore Fractalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…15). There being no explanation for slopes in this range, Schmidt (1982) first ascribed the scattering to a power-law size distribution of pores, since this gives a power-law scattering function. Later, Bale & Schmidt (1984) presented an alternative explanation -that the pores have fractally rough surfaces.…”
Section: Surface and Pore Fractalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a final, historical note, it should be pointed out that an early nonfractal interpretation of nonintegral scattering exponents was put forth by Schmidt (1982), who realized that a power-law distribution of spheres, platelets or rods could give rise to scattering functions with fractional exponents.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…About four years earlier (Schmidt, 1982), I calculated the intensity of the small-angle scattering from independently scattering randomly oriented polydisperse systems of non-fractal scatterers in which the distribution of the diameters was proportional to a power law (in 1982 I had not yet heard about fractals). In this calculation, the diameter distribution p(s c) was defined so that p(~)d~: was equal to the probability that the diameter s c of a scatterer had a value between ~ and s c + d~: [thus p(~) is proportional to the number distribution of the diameters of the scatterers].…”
Section: Polydisperse Systems Of Mass and Surface Fractalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At high q, the substructure to the mass-fractal morphology limits the mass-fractal power law. Often, the substructure is a threedimensional level with a power law described by Porod's law or surface-fractal scaling laws (Schmidt, 1992), in contrast to the one-dimensional rod substructure conventionally used for organic polymers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of mass scaling laws to scattering from disordered materials has led to an understanding of weak power-law decays in terms of mass-fractal morphologies (Schmidt, 1992;Korberstein, Morra & Stein, 1980;Debye, Henderson & Brumberger, 1957;Fisher & Burford, 1967). These power-law decays display power-law slopes shallower than -3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%