2012
DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2012.658361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretation of the coefficient of determination of an ANOVA model as a measure of polarization

Abstract: In this paper, it is demonstrated that coefficient of determination of an ANOVA linear model provides a measure of polarization. Taking as the starting point the link between polarization and dispersion, we reformulate the measure of polarization of Zhang and Kanbur using the decomposition of the variance instead of the decomposition of the Theil index. We show that the proposed measure is equivalent to the coefficient of determination of an ANOVA linear model that explains, for example, the income of the hous… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Polarization is a relevant topic in studies on income distribution (Esteban and Ray, 1994;Duclos et al, 2004;Palacios-González and García-Fernández, 2012;Jenkins, 1995;Bossert and Schworm, 2008;Wang and Tsui, 2000;Yitzhaki, 2010;Gigliarano and Mosler, 2009;Foster and Wolfson, 2010) and its original notion is based on the concept of identification-alienation: individuals identify themselves with those having similar income levels, whereas they feel alienated from those with different income levels. When measuring polarization for an ordinal variable whose categories describe the status of an individual, there is polarization when groups of individuals characterized by within-group homogeneity (identification) and between-group heterogeneity (alienation) are observable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polarization is a relevant topic in studies on income distribution (Esteban and Ray, 1994;Duclos et al, 2004;Palacios-González and García-Fernández, 2012;Jenkins, 1995;Bossert and Schworm, 2008;Wang and Tsui, 2000;Yitzhaki, 2010;Gigliarano and Mosler, 2009;Foster and Wolfson, 2010) and its original notion is based on the concept of identification-alienation: individuals identify themselves with those having similar income levels, whereas they feel alienated from those with different income levels. When measuring polarization for an ordinal variable whose categories describe the status of an individual, there is polarization when groups of individuals characterized by within-group homogeneity (identification) and between-group heterogeneity (alienation) are observable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Palacios-González andGarcía-Fernández (2012, p.1546), even though the model in (3) does not include the intercept, the decomposition of the total sum of squares (TSS) into the explained sum of squares (ESS) and the residual sum of squares (RSS) is valid. Then, the coefficient of determination of the model in (3)…”
Section: Measuring Polarization Via Anovamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The link between polarization and ANOVA is outlined by Palacios-González and García-Fernández (2012) in the generalized linear model framework. Palacios-González and García-Fernández follow the Zhang and Kanbur (2001) approach to polarization, which assumes that for k predetermined groups of income receivers the larger the ratio of between-group income inequality to within-group income inequality, the larger the polarization.…”
Section: Measuring Polarization Via Anovamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations