2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2003.11.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretation of the Hume-Rothery rule in quasicrystals and their approximants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First we carried out LDA-DFT calculations on the parent structure of the family, g-brass. [37,41,42] We then found…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…First we carried out LDA-DFT calculations on the parent structure of the family, g-brass. [37,41,42] We then found…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Such a pseudogap has been found experimentally and from first-principles calculations in many sp quasicrystals and approximants [5,8,9]. It has also been found in many icosahedral approximants containing TM elements [5,10,11]; whereas there are contradictory results about decagonal phases (Ref. [12] and Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The origin of the stabilization of quasicrystals is still unclear in spite of many experimental and theoretical studies. For Al-based quasicrystals, a Hume-Rothery mechanism [1,2] has been shown to play a significant role (see for instance [3][4][5] and Refs. therein).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretically, it has been reported that the pseudogap opening of 1/1-Al 52.5 Li 32.5 Cu 15 approximant is not due to the sp-d hybridization, but the interatomic hybridization between Al 3p states. 15 Experimentally, it has been shown that the Fermi sphere in i-Al 6 Li 3 Cu just touches the q-BZs formed by dominant reflections. 16,25 Therefore, the existence of two components in i-Cd 84 Yb 16 suggests that a mechanism other than the Hume-Rothery scenario also works for the pseudogap formation.…”
Section: ͑1͒mentioning
confidence: 99%