2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretative computer-aided lung cancer diagnosis: From radiology analysis to malignancy evaluation

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The DL framework provided an accuracy of 97.27%. Zheng et al [ 49 ] proposed a combination of radiology analysis and malignancy evaluation network (R2MNet) to evaluate pulmonary nodule malignancy by radiology features analysis. In addition, they proposed channel-dependent activation mapping (CDAM) to visualize characteristics and shed light on the decision process of deep neural networks for model explanations (DNN) that obtained an area under the curve (AUC) of 97.52% on nodal radiology analysis.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DL framework provided an accuracy of 97.27%. Zheng et al [ 49 ] proposed a combination of radiology analysis and malignancy evaluation network (R2MNet) to evaluate pulmonary nodule malignancy by radiology features analysis. In addition, they proposed channel-dependent activation mapping (CDAM) to visualize characteristics and shed light on the decision process of deep neural networks for model explanations (DNN) that obtained an area under the curve (AUC) of 97.52% on nodal radiology analysis.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Update bypass rider's location. Typical route used by other riders has been avoided by the bypass rider; the bypass rider's location is updated at random and reported in Equation (27).…”
Section: To Update the Rider's Locationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work [14] used DFCNet for classification and data augmentation techniques for improving the classification performance on the LIDC-IDRI dataset with an accuracy of 86 %. The paper [15] used CNN with R2MNet architecture for classification with the LUNA16 dataset and data augmentation technology by scaling, flip, and rotation and obtained an accuracy of 94.74 %. By studying the relevant papers, it was found that there is no static approach for each dataset to address the class imbalance problem, which would be the best to increase the classification efficiency.…”
Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%