2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.rasd.2019.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) as a tool for participatory research within Critical Autism Studies: A systematic review

Abstract: Interpretative phenomenological analysis is distinctive in foregrounding participants' interpretations. As such, it is potentially useful for gaining an insight into the lived experience of autistic individuals and aligns well with participatory approaches. This paper provides the first systematic review of IPA studies that have employed a participatory approach and considers their contribution to Critical Autism Studies. Method Four electronic databases were searched to identify peer-reviewed empirical resear… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Biggerstaff and Thompson (2008) highlight that Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA: Larkin et al, 2006;Smith, 2004) is a robust method for understanding experiences due to going beyond simply giving a voice to the participants, by additionally providing an approach for drawing out meaning that may be of use in understanding processes relevant to well-being. Indeed, Howard et al (2019) and MacLeod (2019) argue that IPA provides a close and considered approach to understanding autistic experience. The aim of this study was, therefore, to better understand and identify themes relating to experiences of motherhood by autistic women.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biggerstaff and Thompson (2008) highlight that Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA: Larkin et al, 2006;Smith, 2004) is a robust method for understanding experiences due to going beyond simply giving a voice to the participants, by additionally providing an approach for drawing out meaning that may be of use in understanding processes relevant to well-being. Indeed, Howard et al (2019) and MacLeod (2019) argue that IPA provides a close and considered approach to understanding autistic experience. The aim of this study was, therefore, to better understand and identify themes relating to experiences of motherhood by autistic women.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior work has argued that interview data from children with ASD, specifically qualitative approaches using interpretative phenomenological analysis, can better ensure a foundation of equality between the participant and researcher, thus elucidating the experiences of individuals with ASD. In the context of our study, such an approach could have extended opportunities for users with ASD to represent their needs and goals when using technology (MacLeod, 2019 ). Interviewing close proxies to users with ASD, such as parents, is increasingly acknowledged in the literature as contributing somewhat different but complementary forms of information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, texts were incorporated into this data base in question areas derived from survey sections. Third, these combined data were analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA), a method frequently used to scrutinise and interpret how participants make sense of their unique experiences (Pietkiewicz & Smith, 2014) and a valuable method to use in autism-specific research (MacLeod, 2019). The data were coded and recoded several times to reveal patterns of similarities and differences in what the girls shared in relation to their experiences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Online communication tools (Skype, FaceTime, WhatsApp, and Messenger) enabled the researcher to build genuine rapport and trust with participating girls and to be flexible with timing during face-to-face interviews. These aspects are integral to interpretative phenomenological interview procedures (Alase, 2017;MacLeod, 2019). Verbatim transcripts were prepared and emailed to the participants for member checking of content (Creswell, 2014) prior to analysis.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%