2021
DOI: 10.36680/j.itcon.2021.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpreted open data exchange between architectural design and structural analysis models

Abstract: The heterogeneity of the architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) industry reflects on digital building models, which differ across domains and planning phases. Data exchange between architectural design and structural analysis models poses a particular challenge because of dramatically different representations of building elements. Existing software tools and standards have not been able to deal with these differences. The research on inter-domain building information modelling (BIM) frameworks does … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 2 gives a brief overview of the research design. The conceptual framework is thoroughly described in [9]. The current work describes the details of the framework implementation, and tests its applicability in practice.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Table 2 gives a brief overview of the research design. The conceptual framework is thoroughly described in [9]. The current work describes the details of the framework implementation, and tests its applicability in practice.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be assigned to three problems: (i) the structural engineers work with established standards and recommendations which are not suitable for automatic data exchange as such; (ii) academic proposals of data exchange solutions are project-or software-tool-specific and vaguely integrate existing data exchange rules, making them unreliable for engineers as they are held responsible for their calculations; (iii) software industry does not manage to answer the heterogeneity of workflows and provides software-tool-specific solutions whose usefulness and usability depend on specific combinations of software applications. Regarding problem (i), in the previous work [9] the existing standards are investigated and included in the new data exchange framework. Rules with digitalization potential found in standards are mainly suitable for the validation step, before the interpretations take place, whereby the rules suitable for interpretation of geometry are rarely found.…”
Section: Structural Requirements and Interpretationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The second paper was presented by Sibenik and Kovacic (2021). A novel data management framework is proposed to efficiently support the model-based data exchange between architectural design and structural analysis tools based on classification, interpretation and automation.…”
Section: Paper 2: Interpreted Open Data Exchange Between Architectural Design and Structural Analysis Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%