2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2019.101495
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpreting and responding to ambiguous natural images in spider phobia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To put it differently, spiders are a specific stimulus eliciting augmented fear in general population not just in people with high fear of spiders or in spider phobics. If this was not the case, the specificity of spiders could be doubted as a pathological deviation from standard (but see [ 105 ]). But according to our results, elevated fear of spiders compared to other arthropods is shared by all people in general, our work further points toward the evolutionary roots of negative emotions elicited by spider stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To put it differently, spiders are a specific stimulus eliciting augmented fear in general population not just in people with high fear of spiders or in spider phobics. If this was not the case, the specificity of spiders could be doubted as a pathological deviation from standard (but see [ 105 ]). But according to our results, elevated fear of spiders compared to other arthropods is shared by all people in general, our work further points toward the evolutionary roots of negative emotions elicited by spider stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is frequently used to corroborate findings from the SPQ (e.g. Haberkamp et al, 2019) and has shown good psychometric qualities (Rinck et al, 2002). The internal consistency in our sample was excellent ( α = .97).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants responded to each video on self-report scales of perceived uncontrollability and unpredictability as well as fear, disgust, arousal and valence (cf. Haberkamp et al, 2019). We tested the following hypotheses:…”
Section: Study and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Items are rated on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 0 = not at all to 6 = very much . It is frequently used to corroborate findings from the SPQ (e.g., Haberkamp et al, 2019) and has shown good psychometric qualities (Rinck et al, 2002). The internal consistency in our sample was α = .97.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%