2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2011.06.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpreting data dispersion and “inverted” dates in apatite (U–Th)/He and fission-track datasets: An example from the US midcontinent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
137
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
7
137
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One reason for this disparity may lie in regional Early Jurassic reheating (Veselovskiy et al, 2013). Similar mismatches between geological and geomorphological indicators of denudation depths and AFT results have, however, been reported from other shield and platform areas (Gunnell, 2000;Hall & Bishop, 2002;Gunnell et al, 2003;Peulvast et al, 2008;Flowers & Kelley, 2011). Specifically, identification of reheating in AFT studies has led to appeals for burial by thick sedimentary covers of which few, if any traces remain (Gunnell, 2000).…”
Section: Synthesissupporting
confidence: 52%
“…One reason for this disparity may lie in regional Early Jurassic reheating (Veselovskiy et al, 2013). Similar mismatches between geological and geomorphological indicators of denudation depths and AFT results have, however, been reported from other shield and platform areas (Gunnell, 2000;Hall & Bishop, 2002;Gunnell et al, 2003;Peulvast et al, 2008;Flowers & Kelley, 2011). Specifically, identification of reheating in AFT studies has led to appeals for burial by thick sedimentary covers of which few, if any traces remain (Gunnell, 2000).…”
Section: Synthesissupporting
confidence: 52%
“…11C and 12B) suggests that, in some cases, anomalously large sample dispersion may indicate a problem with apatite eU zonation. A recent study showed that substantial AHe data dispersion for a cratonic basement sample without date-eU and date-grain size correlations could be reasonably explained using a viable range of eU zonation (Flowers and Kelley, 2011). Thus, simply not interpreting data from irreproducible AHe datasets that lack date-eU and date-grain size patterns is a straightforward approach to avoiding misinterpretation of such samples (Flowers and Kelley, 2011).…”
Section: Summary Of Eu Zonation Effects On Sample Ahe Datesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study showed that substantial AHe data dispersion for a cratonic basement sample without date-eU and date-grain size correlations could be reasonably explained using a viable range of eU zonation (Flowers and Kelley, 2011). Thus, simply not interpreting data from irreproducible AHe datasets that lack date-eU and date-grain size patterns is a straightforward approach to avoiding misinterpretation of such samples (Flowers and Kelley, 2011). Alternatively, one could acquire additional information regarding eU zonation or evaluate other potential causes of dispersion such as He implantation from neighboring grains (e.g., Spiegel et al, 2009) or U-Th rich micro-inclusions (e.g., Vermeesh et al, 2007) to help decipher the significance of the dataset.…”
Section: Summary Of Eu Zonation Effects On Sample Ahe Datesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intrasample scatter of (U-Th)/ He apparent ages, some of which are older than coexisting AFT apparent ages (i.e., the inverted AHe-AFT age relationship) is not uncommon in AHe thermochronology and has been attributed to several different processes, including (1) differential He diffusion properties mainly controlled by radiation damage in individual apatite crystals (Green et al 2006;Shuster et al 2006;Flowers et al 2009;Flowers and Kelley 2012); (2) uneven distribution of U-Th within single-apatite grains, leading to incorrect alpha-recoil corrections and resulting in complex 4 He profiles and radiation damage distributions (Hourigan et al 2005;Farley et al 2011;Ault and Flowers 2012); (3) fragmentation of originally larger grains, resulting in AHe age that represents only a portion of He distribution in the original grain (Beucher et al 2012;Brown et al 2013); (4) injection of alpha particles from U-Th-rich inclusions such as zircon, monazite, or allanite (House et al 1997;Ehlers and Farley 2003;Vermeesch et al 2007); and (5) implantation of 4 He from adjacent U-Th-rich phases (Farley 2003;Spiegel et al 2009;Murray et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differential He diffusion parameters among different grains in the same sample may be amplified when apatite grains have a relatively large intergrain variation of eU (p [U] ϩ 0.235 [Th]) and have experienced prolonged residence at the shallow crustal level (Flowers and Kelley 2012). However, the ZFT ages from the Kythera and Peloponnese samples are in the range of 9.1-21.3 Ma, suggesting that the rocks experienced a subduction-related metamorphic reheating event at conditions above ∼240Њ ‫ע‬ 50ЊC (ZFT closure temperature; Brandon et al 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%