2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2021.105335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpreting gaps: A geoarchaeological point of view on the Gravettian record of Ach and Lone valleys (Swabian Jura, SW Germany)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hohle Fels has a long history of geoarchaeological analysis (Goldberg et al 2003;Schiegl et al 2003;Barbieri et al 2018Barbieri et al , 2021, which saw the application of a number of different analytical techniques. In addition to the previously mentioned study of combustion features (Schiegl et al 2003;, Goldberg and Miller focused on the depositional and post-depositional processes acting at the site.…”
Section: Previous Geoarchaeological Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hohle Fels has a long history of geoarchaeological analysis (Goldberg et al 2003;Schiegl et al 2003;Barbieri et al 2018Barbieri et al , 2021, which saw the application of a number of different analytical techniques. In addition to the previously mentioned study of combustion features (Schiegl et al 2003;, Goldberg and Miller focused on the depositional and post-depositional processes acting at the site.…”
Section: Previous Geoarchaeological Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This observation led to the work of Barbieri and colleagues. Across the Pleistocene and Holocene, the land formation model (Barbieri et al 2018(Barbieri et al , 2021 in the Ach valley sees phases of soil formation, hillslope denudation, river valley incision and floodplain aggradation. The alternation of these phases, especially those related to the Last Glacial Maximum, contributed to the formation of the archaeological deposits in the valley floor but also resulted in the erosion of the hillslopes and also some of the deposits contained within the cave.…”
Section: Previous Geoarchaeological Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advances in digital geoarcheology that take advantage of air‐ and satellite‐based remote sensing (Siart et al ., 2018), soil mapping (Bertran et al ., 2021) and GIS‐based predictive modeling are such approaches (Blundell, 2020) that may contribute to our understanding of marginal zones of loess distribution which have hitherto received archeological little attention. In areas where loess mantles are thin, advances in shallow ground‐based remote sensing techniques such as geomagnetics and ground‐penetrating radar are uniquely positioned to identify new sites and map local Pleistocene landscapes (Urban et al ., 2019; Barbieri et al ., 2021). Such methods are seldom employed in European Pleistocene archeology, but the properties of loess make such thin exposures ideal for identifying distributions of past hearths, pits, stone and bone arrangements indicative of other site ‘furniture’.…”
Section: Gathering Dust: New Directions For Quaternary Loess and The Paleolithicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Erosion influenced the preservation of archaeological deposits in the transition from the late Aurignacian to the Gravettian (Goldberg et al, 2003(Goldberg et al, , 2019Miller, 2015), while erosive processes removing Gravettian material were also recorded in Hohlenstein-Stadel in the Lone Valley (Barbieri & Miller, 2019;Hornauer-Jahnke, 2019). A different approach combining site-and landscape-scale analyses was followed by Barbieri et al (2018Barbieri et al ( , 2021, who demonstrated that cave erosion is triggered by regional landscape changes for both the Ach and Lone valleys. In this regard, Barbieri et al (2018Barbieri et al ( , 2021 documented increased cave erosion in the Lone Valley during the Gravettian, calling into question the notion of a decreased human presence in the Lone, in comparison to the Ach, based on lower find densities (Conard et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A different approach combining site-and landscape-scale analyses was followed by Barbieri et al (2018Barbieri et al ( , 2021, who demonstrated that cave erosion is triggered by regional landscape changes for both the Ach and Lone valleys. In this regard, Barbieri et al (2018Barbieri et al ( , 2021 documented increased cave erosion in the Lone Valley during the Gravettian, calling into question the notion of a decreased human presence in the Lone, in comparison to the Ach, based on lower find densities (Conard et al, 2012). According to these findings, we hypothesize that geogenic processes might have a greater impact on the distribution of Paleolithic occupation evidence in the valleys of the Swabian Jura than previously assumed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%