2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2014.05.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpreting human genetic variation with in vivo zebrafish assays

Abstract: Rapid advances and cost erosion in exome and genome analysis of patients with both rare and common genetic disorders has accelerated gene discovery and illuminated fundamental biological mechanisms. The thrill of discovery has been accompanied, however, with the sobering appreciation that human genomes are burdened with a large number of rare and ultra rare variants, thereby posing a significant challenge in dissecting both the effect of such alleles on protein function and the biological relevance of these ev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zebrafish has been increasingly used to validate candidate disease genes because they represent a model organism that is a good compromise between speed of testing and relative closeness to human biology (Davis et al 2014). For example, a recent, large-scale exome-sequencing project identified genes putatively causing developmental disorders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zebrafish has been increasingly used to validate candidate disease genes because they represent a model organism that is a good compromise between speed of testing and relative closeness to human biology (Davis et al 2014). For example, a recent, large-scale exome-sequencing project identified genes putatively causing developmental disorders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both our group and others have shown that in vivo complementation assays in zebrafish embryos are a sensitive and specific approach to test the pathogenicity of missense mutations implicated in human genetic disease (Zaghloul et al 2010; Wan et al 2012;Niederriter et al 2013;Davis et al 2014). To test the effect of p.K78E on RPL10 function, coinjection of rpl10 tb-MO with mRNA harboring p.K78E failed to rescue the morphant phenotype and resulted in significantly decreased forebrain cross-sectional area (43,390 mm 2 ) when compared to the WT rescue (60,203 mm 2 ; P , 0.0001; n = 30; repeated twice); body length was not affected (P = 0.34; n = 30; Figure 2, B and C, Table S3).…”
Section: Rpl10 Mutation Causes Microcephaly 727mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although computational methods are beginning to find acceptance as clinical diagnostic tools (Richards et al 2015), they have limited predictive power (Mathe et al 2006;Chan et al 2007;Cline and Karchin 2011;Thusberg et al 2011;Castellana and Mazza 2013;Frousios et al 2013;Gnad et al 2013). Experimental assessment of variant function in human cells is hampered by inefficient allele replacement technology and by the presence of paralogs with overlapping functions, making complementation testing in 'humanized' model organisms an attractive alternative (Marini et al 2008;Trevisson et al 2009;Mayfield et al 2012;Davis et al 2014;Laurent et al 2015). Complementation of mutant versions of model organism genes by cognate human genes is a classic method to identify human gene function (Lee and Nurse 1987;Levitan et al 1996;Osborn and Miller 2007;Keegan et al 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complementation of mutant versions of model organism genes by cognate human genes is a classic method to identify human gene function (Lee and Nurse 1987;Levitan et al 1996;Osborn and Miller 2007;Keegan et al 2011). Such complementation relationships can then be exploited to assess the impact of amino acid changes in human proteins Cox 1994, 1995;Marini et al 2008;Trevisson et al 2009;Wei et al 2010;Mayfield et al 2012;Dimster-Denk et al 2013;Davis et al 2014). Like computational methods, complementation assays in experimentally tractable model organisms allow functional assessment of human variation at a scale that is commensurate with the size of the human population.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%