1993
DOI: 10.1080/00071005.1993.9973974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpreting images: An investigation of the problem of literalism in language use and religious thinking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, Goswami's work (1992 and1998) has shown that very young children can understand metaphors. Similarly, Ashton (1993b) and others have suggested that much of what young children talk about ought to be understood as metaphorical thinking, illustrating their natural tendency to think creatively and imaginatively Matthews 1980Matthews , 1984Petrovich 1988). 24 The educational challenge in teaching midrash texts that make use of non-literal language is to encourage the students to make use of their imagination in order to make sense of the language -and the message -of the text.…”
Section: Unit 2: Exegetical Narrative: the Midrashic Storymentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…More recently, Goswami's work (1992 and1998) has shown that very young children can understand metaphors. Similarly, Ashton (1993b) and others have suggested that much of what young children talk about ought to be understood as metaphorical thinking, illustrating their natural tendency to think creatively and imaginatively Matthews 1980Matthews , 1984Petrovich 1988). 24 The educational challenge in teaching midrash texts that make use of non-literal language is to encourage the students to make use of their imagination in order to make sense of the language -and the message -of the text.…”
Section: Unit 2: Exegetical Narrative: the Midrashic Storymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…These types of texts exemplify to the children that midrash should not necessarily be understood at face value. This aspect of the mini-course puts into practice the following suggestion about the teaching of ancient religious texts: religious education can make productive use of children's capacity for creative thought by drawing on their symbolic and metaphorical understandings for the formation of religious understandings (Ashton , 1993bRadford 1999). • The multi-layering, or complexity, of midrashic texts.…”
Section: Aims Of the Teaching Model: Teaching Some Aspects Of Midrashmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This midrash text illustrates the rabbis' use of metaphorical language. Although prima facie readings of nonliteral language might prove confusing to children at first, Ashton (1993) cites her own work as well as the work of several other authors who have suggested that much of what young children talk about ought to be understood as metaphorical thinking, illustrating their natural tendency to think creatively and imaginatively (Mathews, 1980, andPetrovich, 1988 as cited in Ashton, 1993;see Tizard, 1984, as cited in Ashton, 1993. 10 Thus, the educational challenge in teaching midrash texts that make use of nonliteral language is to encourage the students to make use of their imagination in order to make sense of the language in the text.…”
Section: Unit Three: Midrashic Use Of Metaphormentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In this genre the reduction of complex abstract concepts into simplistic moral object lessons is implied. It is often overtly expressed by means of the formulation of God concepts in the thematic classification of titles assigned by the author of the children's Bible or Bible storybook to categorise individual stories such as, for example, "God is the most powerful" (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)14; Ashton, 1993. ) Identifying the target audience and target culture for children's Bibles, however, is not necessarily a straightforward exercise and may prove misleading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%