Interpreting Legitimation Through Participation: The ASEAN Civil Society Conference

Gerard, Kelly

doi:10.1111/jcms.13179

Cited by 5 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Sebagai pihak yang mengatur mekanisme partisipasi, ASEAN-lah yang menentukan siapa saja dan bagaimana organisasi masyarakat sipil dapat berpartisipasi. Menurut kategori "societal incorporation" dari Jayasuriya dan Rodan, dalam tulisan Kelly Gerard (Gerard, 2021), penentuan mekanisme partisipasi tersebut tidak terlepas dari bias yang melekat pada kontestasi politik dengan sistem demokrasi perwakilan. Mengingat ketentuan-ketentuan tersebut disusun oleh ASEAN, maka arah keterlibatan organisasi masyarakat sipil lebih kepada problem solving serta pembangunan konsensus dari pada penciptaan saluran partisipasi politik bagi aktor-aktor di luar negara (Gerard, 2021).…”

Section: Mekanisme Partisipasi Masyarakat Sipil Dalam Aseanunclassified

“…Pitsuwan juga mendorong adanya berbagai konsultasi dengan organisasi masyarakat sipil dalam isu HAM (Asplund, 2014). Pada AICHR Terms of References menyebutkan bahwa Sekretaris Jenderal dapat mengajukan isu-isu yang relevan untuk menjadi perhatian bagi AICHR (Gerard, 2021). Pitsuwan menginginkan agar isu-isu yang ia angkat bersama AICHR mendapat sumbangsih informasi dari pandangan civil society.…”

Section: Konsultasi Ad Hocunclassified

“…Pitsuwan menginginkan agar isu-isu yang ia angkat bersama AICHR mendapat sumbangsih informasi dari pandangan civil society. Hal tersebut dilakukan melalui beberapa pertemuan dengan organisasi HAM dalam dua agenda yang berbeda (Gerard, 2021).…”

Section: Konsultasi Ad Hocunclassified

“…Forum GO-NGO merupakan forum tahunan yang telah ditetapkan oleh Badan ASEAN untuk Pekerja Migran, Kesejahteraan Sosial, Pembangunan Desa dan Pengentasan Kemiskinan. Forum-forum tersebut diadakan sebelum pertemuan tahunan para menteri sektoral terkait dan diarahkan untuk menciptakan peluang dialog antar pejabat dengan organisasi masyarakat sipil (Gerard, 2021). Forum-forum ini secara umum meliputi beberapa seri panel, setelah partisipan dikelompokkan ke dalam beberapa grup dan merancang rekomendasi berdasarkan hasil diskusi.…”

Section: Forum Go-ngounclassified

“…Salah satu contoh yaitu pemerintah Indonesia dan Filipina yang mengesahkan kontribusi SAPA Task Force dan asosiasi pekerja migran dalam kebijakan regional yang mengatur hak-hak pekerja migran. Setelah menyelenggarakan berbagai konsultasi di tujuh negara ASEAN, Satgas tersebut membuat 192 rekomendasi dan melakukan presentasinya pada Sekretariat ASEAN dan pejabat ASEAN Labor pada Mei 2009, sesaat sebelum ASEAN Forum on Migrant Labor kedua pada Juli 2009 (Gerard, 2021).…”

Section: Forum Go-ngounclassified

See 4 more Smart Citations

Telaah Keterlibatan Masyarakat Sipil dalam Tata Kelola ASEAN

Ginanjar

Maksum

2022

Jurnal Sospol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ASEAN is facing criticism in its journey towards a regional organization that involves civil society participation based on Vision 2020 which was first introduced on 15 December 1997. Whereas after the regional financial crisis in 1997-1998, ASEAN leaders began to promote people-oriented ideas in Southeast Asia. Thus, this paper aims to explain the mechanism for involving civil society in ASEAN governance. The logic of appropriateness about the involvement of civil society in the policy-making process at global institutions becomes a theoretical framework for understanding implementation in regional organizations. This study applies a qualitative analysis method. The technique of collecting data is through literature study that relies on research publications, government reports, and internet-based literature. The results of the study understand that the ASEAN Charter and Guidelines for Affiliation of Civil Society Organizations 2012 are official documents that contain rules for ASEAN in opening up space for civil society involvement in governance in ASEAN. There are three mechanisms for involving civil society in ASEAN governance, namely affiliates, ad hoc consultations and GO-NGO forums. The contribution of civil society is adjusted to the prevailing institutional objectives. However, these three participation mechanisms serve to limit civil society organizations from using these channels to challenge policies or propose alternative agendas.

show abstract

Section: Mekanisme Partisipasi Masyarakat Sipil Dalam Aseanunclassified

Section: Konsultasi Ad Hocunclassified

Section: Forum Go-ngounclassified

See 3 more Smart Citations

Telaah Keterlibatan Masyarakat Sipil dalam Tata Kelola ASEAN

Ginanjar

Maksum

2022

Jurnal Sospol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Remaking the Regional: Legitimacy and Political Participation in Regional Integration

Gerard

Mickler

2021

J of Common Market Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The EU's profound crisis has drawn into sharp relief the challenges of reconfiguring national democratic processes around regional political communities. Over the same period for which the EU has fractured, however, other regional organizations have intensified integration. These divergent trends raise urgent questions regarding how regional organizations seek to legitimate integration and associated measures to regionalize decision-making, and how these legitimation processes can be compared across regional organizations. This article focuses not on specifying how regional organizations should legitimate their activities, but instead on explaining how and why legitimation processes have been crafted in particular ways. Drawing on recent contributions in state theory and political geography, as well as political participation and de-politicisation, the article advances an innovative approach to understanding how regional integration is (de)legitimated by, first, analysing state-making and regionalism as ongoing and mutually constituted processes, and second, examining the design and function of participatory innovations.

show abstract

In Quest for Discursive Legitimation of Ongoing Policy Processes: Constructing Brexit as a Success Story

Meislová¹

2022

J of Common Market Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article brings together insights from the literatures on policy process, policy legitimation and legitimacy discourse to shed new light on the temporal structure of discursive legitimation of policy processes. It argues that in order to satisfy complex demands on their legitimacy, ongoing policy processes are legitimated not only by referring to the current state of affairs (status quo legitimation), but also by legitimating the future (status ad quem legitimation) and delegitimating the past (status quo ante delegitimation). Presenting an original typology of three distinct temporal regimes of policy process legitimation, this inquiry explores its validity on the empirical case of Brexit. Combining qualitative content analysis and the discourse-historical approach (DHA) to discourse studies, the article elucidates how exactly Brexit was officially legitimated within the three temporal regimes by the UK Conservative government in 2021that is, during the first year of 'full' Brexit.

show abstract

Interpreting Legitimation Through Participation: The ASEAN Civil Society Conference

Cited by 5 publications

References 42 publications

Telaah Keterlibatan Masyarakat Sipil dalam Tata Kelola ASEAN

Telaah Keterlibatan Masyarakat Sipil dalam Tata Kelola ASEAN

Remaking the Regional: Legitimacy and Political Participation in Regional Integration

In Quest for Discursive Legitimation of Ongoing Policy Processes: Constructing Brexit as a Success Story

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About