1999
DOI: 10.1080/09644019908414459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpreting nature and politics in the history of Western thought: The environmentalist challenge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indigenous people believe their art reflects that humans are part of nature. By contrast, much of Western thought is based on a dualistic view of nature (that humans are apart from nature), although there are also strong strands that recognise humans as part of nature (Meyer 1999). To prevent environmental collapse, it will be necessary for humans to accept that humans and non‐human nature are connected and interdependent.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indigenous people believe their art reflects that humans are part of nature. By contrast, much of Western thought is based on a dualistic view of nature (that humans are apart from nature), although there are also strong strands that recognise humans as part of nature (Meyer 1999). To prevent environmental collapse, it will be necessary for humans to accept that humans and non‐human nature are connected and interdependent.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars have begun to recognise the importance of moving beyond a dualistic focus of humans and nature to conceptualise humans as 'part of nature'. Applying an ecological worldview, Meyer (1999) proposed that 'humans and non-human nature are necessarily connected and hence interdependent' (p. 3). Despite a growing recognition of the interconnections between humans and nature, a common language has yet to be found to situate human as 'part of nature'.…”
Section: Defining 'Nature'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such formulations dualism carries a heavy load, being responsible for many of the ills of knowledge construction since the Enlightenment. As John Meyer (1999) notes, critique of dualism has represented a common tactic in the social science treatment of nature where Western thought is frequently portrayed as co‐extensive with the ‘cleavage between humanity and nature’ (Meyer, 1999: 7). Yet as Meyer (1999) further observes, it is naïve to assert this dualistic tradition if only because of the commonality of anti‐dualist sentiment within Western thought.…”
Section: Beyond Anti‐dualismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Meyer, this has included the likes of ‘St Francis of Assissi, Spinoza, Emerson, Thoreau, Kropotkin and Heidegger’ (Meyer, 1999: 10). Meyer asserts that such writers cannot be discounted as a ‘minority tradition’, and in consequence, we need ‘call into question . .…”
Section: Beyond Anti‐dualismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation