2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2017.8297145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpreting plenoptic images as multi-view sequences for improved compression

Abstract: Over the last decade, advancements in optical devices have made it possible for new novel image acquisition technologies to appear. Angular information for each spatial point is acquired in addition to the spatial information of the scene that enables 3D scene reconstruction and various post-processing effects. Current generation of plenoptic cameras spatially multiplex the angular information, which implies an increase in image resolution to retain the level of spatial information gathered by conventional cam… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Five LF lenslet images were chosen from a publicly available LF image dataset, namely I01 = Bikes, I02 = Danger de Mort, I04 = Stone Pillars Outside, I09 = Fountain & Vincent 2 and I10 = Friends 1 [3]. The images were carefully selected from those commonly used in literature [7], [9], [10], to provide a variety of scenarios, containing a wide range of details that would be challenging for the compression algorithms in terms of texture and disparity encoding. From each lenslet image, 15 × 15 perspective views of 625 × 434 pixels and depth of 10 bits per color channel were obtained, using the Light Field toolbox v0.4 [11], [12].…”
Section: A Content and Bitrate Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Five LF lenslet images were chosen from a publicly available LF image dataset, namely I01 = Bikes, I02 = Danger de Mort, I04 = Stone Pillars Outside, I09 = Fountain & Vincent 2 and I10 = Friends 1 [3]. The images were carefully selected from those commonly used in literature [7], [9], [10], to provide a variety of scenarios, containing a wide range of details that would be challenging for the compression algorithms in terms of texture and disparity encoding. From each lenslet image, 15 × 15 perspective views of 625 × 434 pixels and depth of 10 bits per color channel were obtained, using the Light Field toolbox v0.4 [11], [12].…”
Section: A Content and Bitrate Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [8] authors encode a subset of the perspective views using HEVC, adopting a linear approximation prior to estimate the non-encoded views. In [9] authors arrange the perspective views into a multiview structure that can be exploited by the corresponding extension of HEVC, namely MV-HEVC. They also propose a rate allocation scheme to progressively assign the QPs in order to optimize the performance.…”
Section: B Encoding Solutions and Data Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantization offset of a frame is estimated based on its distance and view-wise decoding order relative to the reference frame. The methodology was previously proposed for plenoptic image compression 14 and in this work it is extended for LF captured with multi-camera system . The equation (1) presents the quantization offset estimation process for each frame.…”
Section: Prediction and Rate Allocation Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They use HEVC to encode and transmit part of the views, while non-encoded views are estimated by solving an optimization problem. For algorithm P 02, authors arrange the perspective views into a multiview structure that can be exploited by the corresponding extension of HEVC, namely MV-HEVC [5]. They also propose a rate allocation scheme to progressively assign the Quantization Parameters (QP) in order to optimize the performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%