2006
DOI: 10.1108/09593840610700800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpreting socio‐technical co‐evolution

Abstract: PurposeThis paper seeks to understand how software systems and organisations co‐evolve in practice during an IS engagement. Seeks also to argue that complex adaptive system theory (CAS) provides an excellent lens to study the motor of co‐evolution due to its ability to frame the strategies and reinforcement models of actors and to illustrate this by recounting four narratives of the interaction, selection and adaptation of actors arising from a longitudinal case study of an IS engagement. Then sets out to cons… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study carries important practical implications for complex adaptive systems in business and management sciences, in which entities are increasingly getting organized into communities (Jacucci et al , 2006). The proposed community detection method can be used for network-based fraud detection by enabling experts to understand the formation and development of fraudulent setups with an active exchange of information and resources between the firms (Van Vlasselaer et al , 2017).…”
Section: Discussion Implications and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study carries important practical implications for complex adaptive systems in business and management sciences, in which entities are increasingly getting organized into communities (Jacucci et al , 2006). The proposed community detection method can be used for network-based fraud detection by enabling experts to understand the formation and development of fraudulent setups with an active exchange of information and resources between the firms (Van Vlasselaer et al , 2017).…”
Section: Discussion Implications and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, and according to "the objective of the sociotechnical design" that claims the "joint evolution of the social and technological systems" (Munford 2006, p. 321) (this objective has been more recently denoted as co-evolution of the organization and its supportive technology, see e.g., (Kim & Kaplan 2006), the bottom-up approach to conceive a modular and dynamic structure of the organization should inform, or at least not overtly contrast, the construction of the IS artifact supporting it. This means to conceive the IT artifact in terms of a composition of technologies that operate within each primary working system and of the "interaction points" that let them exchange the pertinent information according to the negotiated boundaries: these interaction points are the sutures that connect the various parts of the IS artifact.…”
Section: Sewing Up Locales Into Glocales: Suturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent special issue of the journal Information Technology & People (Jacucci, Hanseth, & Lyytinen, 2006) took a first step in applying this approach to what we know about information systems research (Benbya & McElvey, 2006;Kim & Kaplan, 2006;Moser & Law, 2006). However, a journal that is regularly dedicated to this theme is needed both to publish available research and to foster further research on this important topic.…”
Section: What Does This Mean For Is?mentioning
confidence: 99%