2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11668-011-9451-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpreting the Evidence: Elemental Analysis in the SEM

Abstract: Failure investigation often involves artifact examination in a scanning electron microscope (SEM). In turn, SEM examination often includes elemental analysis of the surfaces examined, e.g., deposits, a fracture surface, a polished cross section, or other surface. However, elemental data can be misinterpreted without a basic understanding of how they are obtained and the inherent limitations and assumptions of the methods employed. Recent experiences of the authors reinforce the importance of these points.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The solution of 0.5 M HCl was prepared by the dilution of 35% HCl (Finar) with doubly distilled water. The size of the zinc metal plate for SEM and AFM was 3 cm × 3 cm 10 .…”
Section: Specimen Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solution of 0.5 M HCl was prepared by the dilution of 35% HCl (Finar) with doubly distilled water. The size of the zinc metal plate for SEM and AFM was 3 cm × 3 cm 10 .…”
Section: Specimen Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%