2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0360-1315(01)00074-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpreting the externalised images of pupils’ conceptions of ICT: methods for the analysis of concept maps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(b) Assisted drawing of a project network diagram detailed the socio-technical resources (including PCs and mobiles) recruited for the participant's most recent school project [39]. Finally, (c) a videotaped facilitated task analysis on a PC or mobile using the "think aloud" method [40]. Participants received a R15 ($1.68) airtime honorarium.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(b) Assisted drawing of a project network diagram detailed the socio-technical resources (including PCs and mobiles) recruited for the participant's most recent school project [39]. Finally, (c) a videotaped facilitated task analysis on a PC or mobile using the "think aloud" method [40]. Participants received a R15 ($1.68) airtime honorarium.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of these correlations was confi rmed by the fact that there was no pattern of signifi cant associations between high concept map scores and those aspects of ICT ownership and use that are not directly related to the Internet (for example, games console ownership, mobile phone ownership, games playing, word processing and desk-top publishing). Further information about the concept mapping methods used in ImpaCT2 including the quantitative analysis can be found in one of the ImpaCT2 fi nal reports (Somekh et al 2002a) and in Mavers et al (2002).…”
Section: Validating the Concept Mapping Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research studies have focused on examining the role of contemporary technologies in classrooms with regard to various issues, e.g., how teachers design tasks and how pupils interact with the digital tools and the affordances of multimodal resources (Bebell & O'Dwyer, 2010;Edwards-Groves, 2011;Jewitt, 2006Jewitt, , 2008Jewitt, , 2011Kress, 2010;Mavers, Somekh, & Restorick, 2002;Selander & Åkerfeldt, 2008.). Research has provided examples of teacher-designed tasks and software programs that offer new opportunities for learning, such as improved learning by classroom interaction with digital tools, learning and understanding of the subject content through visual modes, and learning by the variation of different modes (Bearne, 2009;Birmingham, Davies, & Greiffenhagen, 2002;Dils, 1999;Jewitt, 2006;2008;Mavers, 2003;Tomlinson, 2013;Watters, Conley, & Alexander, 1998).…”
Section: Multimodal Communication In the School Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%