2023
DOI: 10.1017/ics.2023.5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpreting the state–citizen nexus in contemporary Nordic legal and social citizenship: the case of divergence in restriction on freedom of movement as a mitigation policy in the COVID-19 pandemic

Abstract: The aim of this article was to use an interpretivist approach to analyse the state–citizen nexus in general and the conflict between civil and social rights imposing restrictions on people’s freedom of movement during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Nordic countries: Sweden (restrictions were voluntary and relied on nudging and individual implementation), Norway (restrictions of movement were for everyone and was enforced by authorities), and Finland (restrictions of movement were for the capital region and was e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, there were major differences between the internal restrictions and the overall strategies carried out in each country, which led to large differences in the scale and timeline of the pandemic. While movement restrictions within these countries during the epidemic have been analysed, the analyses seem mostly to focus on legal or social aspects (see, e.g., [ 11 , 12 ]). There are also analyses of the different intervention strategies and their effects in these countries, but without explicit analysis of the interactions between the countries [ 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, there were major differences between the internal restrictions and the overall strategies carried out in each country, which led to large differences in the scale and timeline of the pandemic. While movement restrictions within these countries during the epidemic have been analysed, the analyses seem mostly to focus on legal or social aspects (see, e.g., [ 11 , 12 ]). There are also analyses of the different intervention strategies and their effects in these countries, but without explicit analysis of the interactions between the countries [ 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, there were major differences between the internal restrictions and the overall strategies carried out in each country, which led to large differences in the scale and timeline of the pandemic. While movement restrictions within these countries during the epidemic have been analysed, the analyses seem mostly to focus on legal or social aspects (see, e.g., [10,11]). There are also analyses of the different intervention strategies and their effects in these countries, but without explicit analysis of the interactions between the countries [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, there were major differences between the internal restrictions and the overall strategies carried out in each country, which led to large differences in the scale and timeline of the pandemic. While movement restrictions within these countries during the epidemic have been analysed, the analyses seem mostly to focus on legal or social aspects (see, e.g., [11,12]). There are also analyses of the different intervention strategies and their effects in these countries, but without explicit analysis of the interactions between the countries [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%