2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2002.00367
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpreting video features: a comparison of 3D convolutional networks and convolutional LSTM networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high-frequency components contribute to the larger IR drop due to the high switching activity making it essential to capture this accurately. For sequence-tosequence translation tasks, it has been found in ML literature that 3D convolutional layers better capture local temporal information (high frequency components) than LSTMs (which better capture global temporal information) [26,40] .…”
Section: Static and Transient Ir Drop Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high-frequency components contribute to the larger IR drop due to the high switching activity making it essential to capture this accurately. For sequence-tosequence translation tasks, it has been found in ML literature that 3D convolutional layers better capture local temporal information (high frequency components) than LSTMs (which better capture global temporal information) [26,40] .…”
Section: Static and Transient Ir Drop Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%