2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10707-004-5620-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretive Tools for 3-D Structural Geological Modelling Part II: Surface Design from Sparse Spatial Data

Abstract: We present software tools and methods applicable to the geological modelling of sparse spatial and structural data within a 3-D digital environment. Free-form surfaces derived from section-style control frames and constrained by field-based structural measurements are employed as partially automated design aids intended to speed up and streamline the 3-D geological model building process. Some design degrees of freedom such as NURBS tension (or weights), knot sequencing and tying surface features are also disc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…9a). A surface is then created by interpolating between curves in the cross-curve direction using a nonuniforrn rational b-splines (NURBS) interpolation (Sprague and de Kemp, 2005) (Fig. 9b).…”
Section: Methodology Creating Surfaces Using Gocad and Sparsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…9a). A surface is then created by interpolating between curves in the cross-curve direction using a nonuniforrn rational b-splines (NURBS) interpolation (Sprague and de Kemp, 2005) (Fig. 9b).…”
Section: Methodology Creating Surfaces Using Gocad and Sparsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are easy to use and can fit sample points just accounting for numerical constraints in the parametric representation. They are well suited for representing regular surfaces such as folds (Sprague and de Kemp 2005), but raise difficulties to handle discontinuities induced by faults (Fig. 4.3c).…”
Section: Notions Of Geometry Topology and Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-the meth od ol ogy of con struct ing a 3D geo log i cal model based on var i ous in put data (Mal let 1992(Mal let , 1997(Mal let , 2002de Kemp, 1999de Kemp, , 2000Husson and Mugnier, 2003;Lemon and Jones, 2003;Maxelon and Mancktelow, 2005;Sprague and de Kemp, 2005;Dhont et al, 2005;de Kemp et al, 2006;Zhu et al, 2006;Frank et al, 2007;Caumon et al, 2009;Zanchi et al, 2009); -mod el ling of re gional geo log i cal struc tures (Ledru, 2001 and ref er ences therein; Courrioux et al, 2001;Galera et al, 2003;Wu et al, 2005;Zanchi et al, 2009;Snidero et al, 2011;Popovs et al, 2015); -mod el ling of lo cal struc tures and/or min eral de pos its (Fernán dez et al, 2004;Kaufmann and Mar tin, 2008;Wycisk et al, 2009;Schetsellar, 2013;Vanneschi et al, 2014, Martin-Izard et al, 2015Basson et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%