Interprofessional collaboration: A survey of Canadian psychologists and psychiatrists.

Lee, Catherine M.; Schneider, Barry H.; Bellefontaine, Sarah; Davidson, Simon; Robertson, Catharine

doi:10.1037/a0027619

Cited by 10 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…At the regulatory body level, Lee et al (2012) and Church et al (2009) proposed allowing supervision by other professionals to promote IPE and IPP as part of students’ and early career psychologists’ professional development. Acknowledging that this may be contentious, it would seem that if IPE is already occurring in our graduate-level health profession programs, the next logical step is to look at ways this can be expanded in the field to allow for greater interprofessional learning and collaboration.…”

Section: Call To Action: Renewed Leadershipmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Professions are socialized and educated to view situations through distinct lenses, which results in each profession having a unique ‘cognitive map.’ Thus, learning how to see a situation from another professional’s perspective is an important first step to successful IMHCP. The importance of having an awareness of these differing cognitive maps is underscored by the results of a survey of Canadian psychiatrists ( n = 247) and psychologists ( n = 1,040) conducted by Lee, Schneider, Bellefontaine, Davidson, and Robertson (2012). The results indicated that “over one third of respondents reported little or no familiarity with the training, assessment activities, or interventions of the other profession .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Call to action: Interprofessional mental health collaborative practice in rural and northern Canada.

Goodwin¹,

MacNaughton-Doucet

Allan³

2016

Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Interprofessional mental health collaborative practice (IMHCP) is an emerging and vital response to meet the mental health–related demands in rural and northern Canada. Psychology is not currently embracing or meeting the significant opportunities that exist in this dynamic team work environment. This article explores the opportunities and challenges of IMHCP in rural and northern areas and outlines the many ways in which psychology at all levels can engage in this effective, collaborative joining of professionals.

show abstract

Section: Call To Action: Renewed Leadershipmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Call to action: Interprofessional mental health collaborative practice in rural and northern Canada.

Goodwin¹,

MacNaughton-Doucet

Allan³

2016

Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…D'ailleurs, différents auteurs font état d'une « dominance médicale » (Bourgeault & Mulvale, 2006 ;Drewlo, 2014) de l'attitude négative des professionnels de santé l'un envers l'autre, la méconnaissance de l'autre et de son champ de pratique (Lee, Schneider, Bellefontaine, Davidson & Robertson, 2012), mais aussi en raison de facteurs contextuels avec les contraintes de temps et les modèles de rémunération qui ne facilitent pas la collaboration (Drewlo, 2014 (Grenier et al, 2008a) ont montré la volonté des médecins de famille de collaborer avec les psychologues, mais aussi que diverses barrières rendent la collaboration difficile ou peu satisfaisante. Les médecins de famille rapportent qu'il y a souvent une absence de rétroaction de la part des psychologues ou encore des barrières financières et même une certaine difficulté à savoir où trouver les ressources en psychologie (Grenier et al, 2008a ;Chomienne et al, 2011).…”

Section: Perspective Canadienne De La Collaboration Entre Les Médecinunclassified

Collaboration médecine-psychologie : évolution des mentalités en Belgique et évolution du système de soins de santé au Canada

Chomienne

Vanneste

Grenier

et al. 2016

smq

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

L’expertise des psychologues dans l’évaluation et la prise en charge des troubles communs de santé mentale comme l’anxiété et la dépression qui sont fréquents en soins primaires et co-morbides avec les maladies chroniques font des psychologues une ressource essentielle pour les médecins. Les psychologues représentent un large bassin de professionnels spécialisés dans le diagnostic et la pratique de la psychothérapie ; la collaboration médecins-psychologues est d’autant plus critique dans le contexte visant à augmenter l’accès des populations aux traitements psychologiques et aux psychothérapies. Cet article se veut un regard sur l’état de la collaboration entre médecins et psychologues en Belgique et au Canada. Il examine l’évolution des mentalités entre ces deux professions dans une perspective européenne belge et la façon dont le contexte et le système de soins de santé publique au Canada influencent le potentiel de collaboration entre ces deux professions. Les études démontrent la volonté et la facilité qu’ont ces deux professions à collaborer. Mais ceci doit être appuyé par des structures systémiques et académiques facilitantes notamment dans l’apprentissage précoce à la collaboration dans le cursus de ces professions.Objectives 1) To give a portrait of the evolving mentalities prevailing in Belgium on the collaboration between psychologists and general practitioners, and identify the barriers to the development of the collaboration between those two health professionals 2) To report on the primary care reform in Canada, its role in fostering collaborative practice in primary mental health and on the strategies needed to improve collaboration.Methods Literature search using PubMed and Google Scholar.Results Because of the unmet need of psychologists in primary care, general practitioners and psychologists have a propensity to work together. However to facilitate the collaborative process there needs to be system changes and clear definition of scopes of practices. Both countries are at different levels of implementing change. In Belgium for example it is only very recently that the autonomous practice of clinical psychology has been acknowledged. In Canada although the primary care reform has put forward and supported collaborative care, focus on mental health is insufficient. Early reports on collaborative care in the new models of care inconsistently report improved health outcomes. Strategies to improve collaborative care are looking at teaching future health professionals on how to work together by integrating inter-professional education.Conclusion Both the health care system and graduate training need to support foster and teach collaborative care

show abstract

“…In particular the need for interprofessional collaboration between psychologists and psychiatrists has been highlighted (Lee, Schneider, Bellefontaine, Davidson, & Robertson, 2012). More than a third of psychologists and psychiatrists surveyed by Lee and colleagues reported limited knowledge of training, assessment and interventions of the other profession.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interprofessional education for first year psychology students: career plans, perceived relevance and attitudes

Roberts

Forman

2014

Journal of Interprofessional Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Undergraduate psychology students have been largely excluded from interprofessional\ud education (IPE) initiatives. In contrast to many health professions, undergraduate psychology\ud students do not engage in work placements as part of their degree, and many enter careers\ud outside the health care context. However, the collaborative skills gained through an IPE\ud experience may well be beneficial to students who work in this wider context. This research\ud examines whether undergraduate psychology students’ views of IPE vary according to their\ud planned career directions, and if so, whether the perceived relevance of IPE mediates the\ud relationships. A sample of 188 Australian university undergraduate psychology students\ud completed an online questionnaire following completion of a first-year IPE health sciences\ud program. Path analysis indicated that psychology students’ attitudes towards IPE are associated\ud with both professional identification and practitioner orientation, fully mediated through the\ud perceived relevance of IPE to future career and study plans. Stronger professional identification\ud and practitioner orientation were associated with greater perceived relevance and more\ud positive and less negative attitudes towards IPE. Placing a stronger emphasis on the\ud generalizability of IP skills taught may increase students’ awareness of the relevance outside of\ud the health context, reducing disengagement of students planning alternative careers

show abstract

Interprofessional collaboration: A survey of Canadian psychologists and psychiatrists.

Cited by 10 publications

References 5 publications

Call to action: Interprofessional mental health collaborative practice in rural and northern Canada.

Call to action: Interprofessional mental health collaborative practice in rural and northern Canada.

Collaboration médecine-psychologie : évolution des mentalités en Belgique et évolution du système de soins de santé au Canada

Interprofessional education for first year psychology students: career plans, perceived relevance and attitudes

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About