2021
DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.9220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interrater reliability between in-person and telemedicine evaluations in obstructive sleep apnea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The area under the curve for all 4 conditions ranged between 0.62 and 0.69, indicating that search engine data are predictive of sleep disorders, with the prediction being of medium accuracy. We note that sleep disorders are known to be a difficult problem to assess, as evident, for example, in the low agreement among experts at different laboratories on the correct interpretation of diagnostic tests, such as polysomnography, in people with sleep disorders [ 21 ], and modest agreement rates between telemedicine and in-person diagnosis [ 22 ]. Moreover, our data show that the last 60 to 90 days of search data reach the highest prediction quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The area under the curve for all 4 conditions ranged between 0.62 and 0.69, indicating that search engine data are predictive of sleep disorders, with the prediction being of medium accuracy. We note that sleep disorders are known to be a difficult problem to assess, as evident, for example, in the low agreement among experts at different laboratories on the correct interpretation of diagnostic tests, such as polysomnography, in people with sleep disorders [ 21 ], and modest agreement rates between telemedicine and in-person diagnosis [ 22 ]. Moreover, our data show that the last 60 to 90 days of search data reach the highest prediction quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results estimated that a sample size of thirty-five would be required to establish inter-rater and intra-rater reliability (H0 = 0.00, H1 = 0.70, α = 0.05, single tail, power = 0.95) [ 30 ]. To allow for attrition, we increased this estimated sample size by 10% and rounded up to the nearest whole number [ 31 , 32 ], leaving a sample size of thirty-nine.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, these broader concerns regarding OSA pretest probability determination in no way diminish the important work of Yurcheshen et al 6 Their research highlights how increased utilization of sleep telemedicine forces us all to question both how and why we do what we do. Suboptimal interrater reliability, whether assessed through telemedicine or in-person care, is not cause to eliminate a particular physical examination maneuver or to avoid the patient encounter modality (eg, telemedicine) in which it was performed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yurcheshen et al 6 examine these questions in this issue of the Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine. One board-certified sleep medicine physician interviewed and examined a patient in the clinic while a different board-certified sleep medicine physician completed a similar evaluation with the same patient through telemedicine.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation