1991
DOI: 10.1093/ptj/71.2.107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interrater Reliability of Therapists' Judgments of Graphed Data

Abstract: Increased emphasis on the use of single-subject designs in physical therapy research suggests the need to examine whether therapists can meaningfully interpret the results of such research as part of the clinical decision-making process. With this goal in mind, the interrater reliability of therapists to make visual judgments from graphed data that included a trend line was examined. Thirty therapists were presented with 24 graphs of single-subject data from AB (baseline-treatment) designs. Each graph included… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers have recommended that in single-subject designs the use of both visual inspection and statistical analysis methods provides complementary information related to treatment impact (Kazdin, 1982;Harbst et al, 1991;Kratochwill and Levine, 1992;Nourbakhsh and Ottenbacher, 1994). Statisti-cal analysis is particularly useful when changes appear to be small on visual inspection (Kazdin, 1982;Wolery and Harris, 1982;Ottenbacher, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have recommended that in single-subject designs the use of both visual inspection and statistical analysis methods provides complementary information related to treatment impact (Kazdin, 1982;Harbst et al, 1991;Kratochwill and Levine, 1992;Nourbakhsh and Ottenbacher, 1994). Statisti-cal analysis is particularly useful when changes appear to be small on visual inspection (Kazdin, 1982;Wolery and Harris, 1982;Ottenbacher, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, DeProspero and Cohen (1979) found an interrater-agreement coefficient of just .61 (Pearson correlation) among individuals who reviewed articles for publication in behavioral journals. Other studies have found similar or even lower levels of interrater agreement among less experienced visual inspectors (e.g., Boykin & Nelson, 1981;Harbst, Ottenbacher, & Harris, 1991;Ottenbacher, 1990).…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…38,39 For this reason and because small treatment effects were expected, 37 we also used the C statistic to further analyze the data. 40,41 Nourbakhsh and Ottenbacher 42 used 3 statistical methods for single-subject data-the split-middle method of trend estimation, the two-standard deviation bandwidth method, and the C statistic-to analyze the same 42 graphs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%